AI Rate Professor

Biology

Jennifer DeAngelis

BIO31 · BIOS1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if you can stay organized and meet deadlines, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear expectationsLecture heavyTough gradingHelpful when askedStrict deadlines
  • Students describe clear organization and helpful lectures, but grading and deadlines are strict.
  • Getting an A is possible, but it requires steady work, note-taking, and meeting every deadline.
  • Online reviews mention easier lecture access and all-day Google Form tests, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is realistic with , and deadlines, but there is no or late-work cushion.

Online evidence includes one A with all-day tests, while work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The biology content is manageable with , but students still describe it as a hard subject with tricky exams.

Online students found lecture materials easier to follow, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Reviews do not prove a , but participation, lecture notes, and keeping up with class appear important.

Online reviews stress weekly work completion, while in-person and passing.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

62/100

Students recommend her for organization and support, but , and no create real hesitation.

Online feedback is mixed, while for clear teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

because missed work can receive no credit and students repeatedly mention tough grading.

Format shift

Online reviews mention no , while in-person reviews emphasize no late submissions and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload includes long , and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe weekly labs and long lectures, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is often described as , and caring, despite some complaints about flexibility.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews show stronger contrast between excellent support and strict policies.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear to , and tests rather than only exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention labs, discussion posts, and Google Form tests, while , and lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

support and complaints about strict deadlines and no late submissions.

Main concern

.

What students said

“She doesn't do or allows late submissions.”
BIO31
“ , and expectations for the class.”
BIO31

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students found lectures easy to follow, but one review says the A still required strong time management.

Main concern

Weekly work and long lectures can pile up without good time management.

What students said

“Lectures and and easy to follow.”
BIO31
“It wasn't easy to get an A, you gotta work for it.”
BIO31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

wording but an online Google Form test window that one student found more flexible.

Tricky QuestionsGoogle Form TestsAll-Day Online Test WindowQuiz and Exam Study Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quiz or exam study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Tricky QuestionsQuizzes and ExamsStudy Guides
“ and weirdly-worded questions”
BIOS1
“study for she provides”
BIO31

Online

Online exam comments only clearly support Google Form tests available all day, with no proof of .

Google Form TestsAll-Day Test Window
“ so you have all day to do it.”
BIO31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Biology is a HARD subject so no easy A, but she will definitely help you get there!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ , and expectations for the class.”

⚖️

30/100

“She doesn't do or allows late submissions.”

📚 Effort Needed

56/100

“It wasn't easy to get an A, you gotta work for it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures and and easy to follow.
  • She is truly dedicated towards her students to grasp the core of the subject.
  • and out of class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • It wasn't easy to get an A, you gotta work for it.
  • but it's all in her lectures and helpful packets so as long as .
  • The class is not super hard but I had real life issues and I was not able to submit 2 assignments and that dropped my grade to a "C".

Theme 3

⏰ About Flexibility

  • This professor has very strict but reasonable due dates, no exceptions and .
  • She doesn't do or allows late submissions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across multiple years give consistent detail about teaching clarity, workload, deadlines, and grading.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO316 reviews
BIOS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1