AI Rate Professor

Art

Mark Wagner

ART13A · DIGM1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and supportive feedback, especially in online ART13A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderVague FeedbackRedo FriendlySupply CostsAvoid If Possible
  • and vague feedback.
  • Redo opportunities help some students recover grades, but they do not remove the stress.
  • Online reviews are mostly negative and warn against taking the class for an easy grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Redos can improve grades, but students warn that , and not an easy A.

Online reviews are mostly harsh about grading, while the to an A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course feels harder because expectations are subjective, instructions are unclear, and .

Online reviews provide most difficulty evidence, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students advise against the class because grading and .

Online reviews are mostly avoidant, and the if other options exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or , though resubmissions can soften the .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly emphasize harsh grading, while the .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention lots of time, supplies, and stress, especially in online ART13A.

Format shift

Online reviews drive the heavy workload rating; the and criticism.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

as vague, communication weak, and criticism unhelpful, despite one .

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly negative about communication and feedback, while the criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Grades , and project criteria rather than exams.

Format shift

and resubmissions, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The lone in-person review says the class can be easy because redos are allowed, but warns that he is picky, rude, and .

Main concern

The evidence is only one review, but and demeanor.

What students said

“He's very picky.”
ART13A
“He allows redos for a better grade up to an A.”
ART13A
“If there are .”
ART13A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing harsh or , and required supplies, with one positive review about flexibility.

Main concern

and hard to satisfy.

What students said

“ .”
ART13A
“ .”
ART13A
“He lets you resubmit though!”
ART13A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If there are .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting grading, feedback, workload, and redo policies. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • He's very picky.
  • , but students spoke up and grades were adjusted.
  • easy grade.

Theme 2

💬

  • This guy's communication isn't the best.
  • .
  • you will not find a way to actually to receive genuine criticism

Theme 3

🔁 About Redos & Flexibility

  • He allows redos for a better grade up to an A.
  • He lets you resubmit though!
  • Allows .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews give detailed and consistent concerns, but the sample is small and only one review is in person.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART13A5 reviews
DIGM11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2