AI Rate Professor

Early Childhood Education

Ana Gutierrez

30639ECD · COS126 · ECD56 · ECD50 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if you can stay organized and participate, but avoid her if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInconsistent clarityParticipation mattersHeavy homeworkMixed gradingCaring for prepared students
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who find her caring and .
  • Many A grades are possible, but , and strict deadlines.
  • reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

A grades are common, but , and navigating sometimes unclear expectations.

Online evidence is mixed and more effort-heavy, while if work is completed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content itself is often manageable, but and workload make the experience harder for some students.

Online reviews report more confusion, while as easier and more guided.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation and , and some reviews warn that missing class can hurt or even risk being dropped.

Online reviews emphasize participation and deadlines, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

, but the strong negative comments about clarity and grading make the recommendation conditional.

, while online reviews are polarized with several severe complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some students report extra points and , while others call her a .

Format shift

Online reviews contain , while in-person reviews lean clearer and easier.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many reviews mention lots of assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews especially emphasize heavy workload, while of work.

Teaching experience

Average

61/100

Her teaching is praised by some students as caring and knowledgeable, but others describe her as unclear and inconsistent.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are polarized, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention assignments, , and tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, assignments, and projects, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly describe her as kind, experienced, and manageable if students attend and complete the work.

Main concern

The main concern is required participation and falling behind if class is missed.

What students said

“as long as you do all the ”
ECD50
“if you miss a class you will still pass”
COS126
“You cannot miss class as she has said if you miss more than 3, you can be dropped”
ECD50

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, praising support and in ECD56 but , and tough grading in ECD50 and some sections.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear assignment expectations combined with and .

What students said

“the ”
ECD50
“There is a lot of , and a group project.”
ECD56
“she has horrible grammar and she is even worse at explaining her expectations.”
ECD56

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a , and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or .

Midterm MentionedQuizzes MentionedTests MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation and do not clearly prove exam policy.

Assignments EmphasizedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“not a lot of assignments and they were easy”
ECD50
“a few chapter summaries in the end of most classes”
ECD50

Online

Online reviews mention a midterm, quizzes, tests, and two quiz attempts, but do not .

Midterm MentionedQuizzes MentionedTests MentionedTwo Quiz Attempts
“got a good grade on the midterm”
ECD56
“She has 2 attempts on Quizzes”
ECD56
“There is a lot of , and a group project.”
ECD56

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard work pays off.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting split opinions , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

61/100

“The content is so interesting, but she makes it so boring and painful to do.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“There is a lot of , and a group project.”

⚖️

52/100

“Her grading is fair and if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is an awesome teacher with very good teachings!
  • .
  • of experience for every topic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you do all the
  • she has the nerve to be a
  • She is serious about deadlines and you won't get another chance.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Participation

  • If you are lazy and wait for the last .
  • She likes when the class participates.
  • there is a lot of work involved, so this class is not for the lazy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across online and but polarized evidence over several years.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ECD567 reviews
ECD505 reviews
30639ECD2 reviews
COS1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 9 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1