AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marcia Kolb

MATH · MATH65 · ALG · MATH1 · MAT105 · MATH2 · CAL · MATH55 · MATH1MATH2 · MTH2 · MATH105L · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a clear and patient math instructor, but expect to keep up with homework and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear explanationsHelpful math teacherOrganized notesDaily homeworkTough tests
  • Most students praise Kolb for clear, organized math teaching that makes difficult material easier to understand.
  • The course content is still math-heavy and can involve .
  • , and many comments are old, so the pattern is useful but not current.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is and study her notes or reviews, but and strict expectations prevent an effortless grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Kolb makes math clearer, but calculus and algebra content remains challenging for students who struggle with tests or memorization.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online course evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

because notes, lectures, homework review, and daily exercises are central to success.

, and no strict attendance policy is clearly proven.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students strongly recommend her because she explains math clearly, gives useful notes, and helps students understand difficult material.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, many of which are older but consistently positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

but not lenient, with several comments , and needing homework or strong exam scores.

Format shift

online data.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is moderate because some students mention daily homework, quizzes, exercises, and memorization, though .

Format shift

All , and workload likely varies by math course level.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students , and able to make math understandable despite a few negative reviews.

Format shift

All , and there are no online comparisons.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and tests, with tests carrying meaningful pressure.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is from in-person reviews, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly describe her as , and strong at explaining math, with some complaints , and homework.

Main concern

Some students found the , and the lectures boring.

What students said

“She's thorough and well-paced at teaching the material.”
MTH2
“ as hell.”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard to somewhat demanding because students mention , and review materials, but no special proctoring or .

Hard TestsExam ReviewsHelpful NotesQuizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reviews, and helpful notes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or final format.

Hard TestsWeekly QuizzesExam ReviewsHelpful Notes
“ as hell.”
MATH2
“she also gives out good reviews for her exams so that you know what to study for.”
MATH55

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The material is obviously quite tough (it's calculus for crying out loud), but Ms. Kolb is very understanding of students' viewpoints and is very good at.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She explained things in a way I could understand.”

📚 Course Challenge

45/100

“The material is obviously quite tough (it's calculus for crying out loud).”

⚖️

45/100

“ grade hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but the lectures were a little boring.
  • and very helpful.
  • She's thorough and well-paced at teaching the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not a easy B. I had to work for a B.
  • as long as you do the hw, you wont find the
  • and grades to hard!!

Theme 3

📝 About Support Materials

  • she hand out sheets on what she's .
  • she always goes over the h.w. problems before she goes on to the next section
  • she also gives out good reviews for her exams so that you know what to study for.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 19 reviews with consistent detail, but most comments are very old and only one is recent.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH556 reviews
CAL2 reviews
MATH12 reviews
MATH22 reviews
ALG1 review
Show 6 more courses
MAT1051 review
MATH1 review
MATH105L1 review
MATH1MATH21 review
MATH651 review
MTH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values