AI Rate Professor

English

Rosa Cabrera

ENG101B · ENG1 · ENG7 · ENGL7 · ENGLISH1A · ENG102 · ENGL162 · ENG4 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are ready for , and a highly specific writing style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingMany papersUnclear feedbackPolarizing content
  • Students consistently describe the workload as heavy, reading-intensive, and paper-heavy.
  • The biggest complaints , and confusing expectations.
  • Some in-person students value her passion and support, but the overall experience is risky and demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible for some students, but most reviews , and matching her strict criteria.

Online reviews make the A path look especially harsh and unclear, while grades by learning her expectations.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course is intellectually demanding because students report , and unclear expectations.

Both formats are challenging, with online students emphasizing vague assignments and , and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly treated as necessary for success, especially in seminar-based classes.

In-person reviews strongly emphasize participation and not missing class, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and the workload overwhelming.

Online reviews are almost uniformly negative, while but still high-risk.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many reviews call her a tough or and say grades depend on meeting narrow or .

Format shift

Online reviews are especially harsh about grading and missing work, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students report multiple , and rushed deadlines.

Format shift

Online reviews describe simultaneous books and vague assignments, while , and seminar participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

She is passionate and sometimes helpful, but many students describe confusing teaching, , and poor organization.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as disorganized and unresponsive, while and confusing expectations.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and reading, and in at least one class.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but and papers, unclear expectations, and polarizing class content.

Main concern

Success depends on matching her criteria, participating, and keeping up with demanding readings and essays.

What students said

“She'll definitely make you work for your grade.”
ENG4
“If you're not on top of .”
ENG7
“No test. ”
ENG4

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing , and harsh grading.

Main concern

Students say unclear directions and .

What students said

“ but and bad with keeping on schedule.”
ENG1
“ .”
ENG1
“She sucks for online because .”
ENG1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove traditional exams, proctoring, ; assessment appears mostly paper-based.

No TestsEssaysReadingSeminarsPapers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and at least one no-test structure, but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

No TestsReadingEssaysSeminars
“No test. ”
ENG4
“There will be about 5 essays with a few books so be ready to read”
ENG4

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

PapersDiscussion BoardsFinal Paper
“she forgot to release the directions for the ”
ENG1
“Assignment Prompt and .”
ENG1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She'll definitely make you work for your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching consistency. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️

18/100

“Can be a and tough in , but is willing to work with students to help them get better.”

📚 Workload

15/100

“Plan to read multiple books simultaneously, which is extremely difficult to keep up with.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • There will be about 5 essays with a few books so be ready to read, trust me you will enjoy a few of them.
  • She gives a lot of work but it isn't hard.
  • She would assign 1-3 20 page papers/essays to read a week.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • She is too harsh on students work.
  • . Expects a lot of participation.
  • .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes an extremely passionate teacher who teaches material she enjoys and it shows through.
  • Barely any communication.
  • Her teaching is only based off black history, like, this is english???? not history????

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews over many years give detailed and , and teaching problems despite some mixed opinions.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG48 reviews
ENG15 reviews
ENG73 reviews
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
ENG101B1 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG1021 review
ENGL1621 review
ENGL71 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1