AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Talia Moore

CPSY212 · PSY1 · ADMJ50 · ADJ50 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an engaging, mostly low-workload class and are , and participate.

Best fit · Easy A HunterFunny and engagingCaring professorLow workloadParticipation mattersOccasional communication issues
  • Most students describe her classes as engaging, funny, and easy if they listen and participate.
  • Workload is usually light, with readings, quizzes, short papers, and .
  • One negative and inconsistent understanding, so the experience is not perfect.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most comments suggest high grades are easy with , and basic reading, though group work and one negative experience add some risk.

, while the single online review is easy but includes discussion posts, reading, and a group project.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students often call the class easy and say quizzes and , though reading and participation still matter.

In-person evidence is stronger and easier overall, while online and textbook reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but students repeatedly say showing up, listening, and participating are key to passing.

and participation, while the online review emphasizes keeping up with Canvas work.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and manageable work, despite one serious complaint about responsiveness.

In-person reviews are mostly enthusiastic, while the single online review is positive but notes a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students say tests match reviews and lectures, assignments are manageable, and passing is easy with attention.

Format shift

, while online evidence shows an A- with straightforward work.

Workload

Light

84/100

Several reviews , and limited projects, though reading still appears.

Format shift

, while the online review adds discussion questions, textbook reading, and a group project.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students find her funny, caring, smart, and engaging, but one review reports poor communication and inconsistent flexibility.

Format shift

and the main complaint, while the single online review is positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and group projects rather than only exams or assignments.

Format shift

Online evidence includes Canvas discussion and a final paper, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students mostly praise , and relatively easy assignments and tests.

Main concern

Participation and , and and inconsistent flexibility.

What students said

“Every quiz and . .”
PSY1
“workload was NADA aside from the .”
ADJ50
“Just show up, pay attention& youll pass!”
ADMJ50

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review describes an easy class with , and a personal COVID-19 final paper.

Main concern

The if teammates do not contribute.

What students said

“Keep up with the and read the textbook ahead of class.”
ADMJ50
“ because I did all the work.”
ADMJ50
“Final was a personal COV 19 paper.”
ADMJ50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests student-friendly assessments that match lectures or reviews, with .

Online quizzes and testsFinal paperTests match quizzes or reviewsNo clearly proven proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention online quizzes and , and a final that match quizzes or class material, with .

Online quizzes and testsMidterm and final match quizzesNo clearly proven proctoring
“Every quiz and .”
PSY1
“ and as her quizzes.”
ADMJ50
“ .”
ADJ50

Online

The online review says the final was a personal COVID-19 paper and does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, or open-book rules.

Final paperProctoring not clearly proven
“Final was a personal COV 19 paper.”
ADMJ50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just show up, pay attention& youll pass!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She was funny, actually cared about what she was teaching, and always encouraged us to participate.”

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“Just show up, pay attention& youll pass!”

⚠️ Communication Risk

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is HILARIOUS and engages the class in .
  • She is very funny and keeps the lectures entertaining.
  • Moore is super smart and a very fun person.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • workload was NADA aside from the .
  • Every quiz and . .
  • and as her quizzes.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • .
  • because I did all the work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years give detailed and mostly consistent evidence, with .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADMJ503 reviews
ADJ502 reviews
CPSY2121 review
PSY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1