AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andreas Mueller

MATH3 · MATH54 · MAT56 · MTH36 · MTH8 · MT37 · MATH37 · MATH1 · MATH53 · MATH55 · MTH2 · MATH194 · MATH4 · MTH104 · MATH104 · MTH37 · MATH8 · MTH56 · MATH2 · MTH53 · MATH192 · MTG53 · MTH55 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
21.95%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you are strong at self-teaching math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard ExamsConfusing LecturesHeavy WorkloadBig CurvesAvoid If Possible
  • Most students describe lectures as , and .
  • as very hard and often unrelated to class preparation.
  • , but students still report stress, withdrawals, and poor learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

, but students still describe exams as brutal and preparation as unreliable.

Online and in-person reviews both criticize exam mismatch, while some grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is made harder by , fast pacing, unclear preparation, and difficult exams.

The lone online review and experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and warnings that skipping class can hurt students, even when attendance itself is inconsistently enforced.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence through pop quizzes; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students advise avoiding him because and .

Both online and in-person evidence are negative, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and some students earn A grades, but many still call the because exams are difficult and unclear.

Format shift

In-person reviews repeatedly mention curves, while the .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy work, with the online review specifically citing many online problems.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments say he reads from the textbook, lectures unclearly, and leaves students unprepared for exams.

Format shift

The online review and the large in-person sample both report poor teaching, with in-person evidence much stronger.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Comments repeatedly , and exams driving the course outcome.

Format shift

Both online and adding frequent pop quiz evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with frequent complaints , and .

Main concern

Students often feel underprepared for exams and must rely on the textbook or outside learning.

What students said

“ and cover unseen material.”
MATH8
“The .”
MTH8

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative, citing , and unrelated exams.

Main concern

Online while and exams that feel disconnected from instruction.

What students said

“You're better off reading the book yourself to learn the material.”
MTH2
“Material on the in class.”
MTH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as hard, poorly aligned with lectures or homework, and central to the grade, though .

Hard ExamsPop QuizzesTest HeavyCurve-Based ExamsExam Content Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

16/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and curve-based grading, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Hard ExamsPop QuizzesTest HeavyCurve-Based Exams
“ and cover unseen material.”
MATH8
“BEWARE of pop quizzes.”
MTH8
“ because everyone fails.”
MTH8

Online

The online review says exams are unrelated to what is taught, but does not clearly .

Exam Content Mismatch
“Material on the in class.”
MTH2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . His tests are ridiculously hard and he does NOT prepare you for them at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He only reads the book in class and solves the few book examples.”

⚠️

16/100

“The what he does in class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ if at all possible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Reads his lectures straight from the book.
  • His teaching was so bland and hard to understand.
  • Bad at lecturing. Tells you to read the book if .

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • and cover unseen material.
  • and he does NOT prepare you for them at all.
  • The .

Theme 3

📉 About Grades and Workload

  • .
  • because everyone fails.
  • By the Final only a third of the class was .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 46 reviews across many courses and years, with a strong and repeated negative pattern.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 530

Course coverage

MTH87 reviews
MATH555 reviews
MATH84 reviews
MATH1923 reviews
MTH553 reviews
Show 18 more courses
MATH32 reviews
MATH42 reviews
MATH532 reviews
MATH542 reviews
MTG532 reviews
MTH1042 reviews
MAT561 review
MATH11 review
MATH1041 review
MATH1941 review
MATH21 review
MATH371 review
MT371 review
MTH21 review
MTH361 review
MTH371 review
MTH531 review
MTH561 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 9

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

5

C 4 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1