AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Desmond Chun

CS42 · BUS16 · BUS7 · CSCI14 · CSCI8 · BUS12 · CS14 · CSCI21 · CMSCI08 · INTROBUSS · CSCI141541 · CSCI19A · BUS1BUS16 · CSCI15 · COMPPROG · CSCI41 · CSCI7 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take Desmond Chun if you can handle sarcasm and lecture-heavy classes, because attentive students often report an easy path to a strong grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSarcastic lecturerEasy A if attentiveLecture-heavyUseful code examplesPolarizing personality
  • Many students say the class is easy if , and follow lecture code examples.
  • His sarcastic and sometimes harsh style is the main reason students either like him or .
  • Assessments often track lecture material closely, making preparation clear for students who tolerate the classroom style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A is often described as easy if students , and use lecture material for tests.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Many students call the courses easy or manageable, though .

In-person reviews consistently frame the course as manageable when students can learn from lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Attendance is usually important because test and assignment material comes from lecture, but .

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance, and they suggest practical .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and easy grading, while negative reviews warn about sarcasm and poor approachability.

and strongly depends on tolerance for his personality.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Multiple students call him an , though some tags mention tough grading.

Format shift

but not unanimous.

Workload

Light

74/100

, and enough time, though lecture time can feel taxing.

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe workload, and .

Teaching experience

Good

69/100

He knows the material and uses useful code examples, but his sarcasm and repetition reduce the experience for many students.

Format shift

In-person reviews are consistent that teaching effectiveness depends on whether students can tolerate his delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and lecture-based tests, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but knowledgeable instructor whose classes can be easy when students follow lecture examples closely.

Main concern

His sarcasm, repetition, and unapproachable tone can make help-seeking uncomfortable.

What students said

“Pay attention to his lecture code examples and it is an easy A.”
CSCI19A
“Don't expect helpful feedback, just confusing sarcasm or condescending remarks.”
CSCI14
“ .”
CSCI41

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to student-friendly preparation, including cheat notes or open notes in several in-person reviews.

Cheat Notes AllowedOpen Notes MentionedLecture-Based TestsReasonable Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention cheat , and finals, but do not prove proctoring rules.

Cheat Notes AllowedOpen Notes MentionedLecture-Based TestsReasonable Exams
“ .”
CSCI41
“He allows 2 pages of , and 4 on his Final.”
CSCI14
“ ”
BUS12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pay attention to his lecture code examples and it is an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 , and personality fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

69/100

“he knows his stuff, shows examples the whole class, and repeats helps me understand what he is trying to get us to know”

📈 Easy A Path

86/100

“As long as you pay attention, you will get an A easy”

⚠️ Personality Risk

45/100

“Don't expect helpful feedback, just confusing sarcasm or condescending remarks.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are code samples, and those codes will REALLY help and assignments
  • He talks a lot.
  • He repeats himself a lot, which gets exhausting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pay attention to his lecture code examples and it is an easy A.
  • .
  • As long as you show up and put in a little bit of effort, you'll be fine.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Personality

  • Mr. Chun has a militant personality
  • He is SUPER sarcastic.
  • Get past the sarcasm and learn a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 43 in-person reviews across many years with repeated themes about , and mixed approachability.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 515
3 out of 59
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CSCI1413 reviews
CSCI76 reviews
CS145 reviews
BUS123 reviews
CSCI19A3 reviews
Show 12 more courses
CSCI82 reviews
BUS161 review
BUS1BUS161 review
BUS71 review
CMSCI081 review
COMPPROG1 review
CS421 review
CSCI1415411 review
CSCI151 review
CSCI211 review
CSCI411 review
INTROBUSS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2