AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Eugene Ionel

MATH43 · MATHSTAT · MATH37 · MATH65 · STATS1 · MATH65A · MATH1 · MTH43 · MATH43STATS · MATH20 · MATH55A · MATH53 · MATH55 · MATH13 · MATH53A · MTH55 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Eugene Ionel only if you are comfortable teaching yourself math and asking for help, because many students report .

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads from bookSelf-study requiredHeavy homeworkPolarizing clarityHelpful if asked
  • Reviews are extremely split, with many older positive comments but and reading from the book.
  • Students often , and asking for help.
  • The class is not reliably easy, and several students report hard tests, heavy homework, dropped classes, or poor clarity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

53/100

Some reviews call it an Easy A, but many others , and .

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The math content is often made , and heavy reliance on the book.

In-person reviews vary by course, but the dominant difficulty evidence is unclear instruction rather than advanced content alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but some reviews say participation or showing up is important for passing.

, and the evidence is mixed rather than clearly mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Despite some strong praise, the dominant , and poor classroom execution.

, and negative comments are frequent and intense.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some reviews mention relaxed grading or open notes, but , and tough outcomes.

Format shift

and years.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Several reviews mention a ton of , and .

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists, and it leans heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Many students say he reads from the book, explains unclearly, arrives late, or .

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are polarized but contain many detailed negative reports.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and graded homework, so assessment appears mixed with a test emphasis.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews show a highly polarizing math instructor, with and some praise for help when students ask.

Main concern

because many reviews say he reads from the book and explains poorly.

What students said

“Does not give students examples on any of the math. Just reads aloud from the book.”
MATH43STATS
“The class is not too difficult if you do and understand the homework because that is directly where the .”
MATH37
“You pretty much have to teach yourself”
MATH65

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy varies by review, with some open-notes or practice-test support but and one report of no notes or calculators.

Open Notes MentionedHard TestsPractice Tests Similar To ExamsNo Notes Mentioned In One Review

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some courses, practice-test alignment, and one course with no notes or calculators.

Open Notes MentionedHard TestsPractice Tests Similar To ExamsNo Notes Or Calculators Mentioned
“No notes, not calculators, no formula sheet on the test.”
MATH20
“The only good thing about the class is that the .”
STATS1
“ .”
MATH43

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You pretty much have to teach yourself, Mr. Ionel only goes over the problems.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ . Just reads from the book aloud.”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“Gives a ton of homework!”

⚖️

58/100

“ but he gives list of questions on his website.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Just reads aloud from the book.
  • You pretty much have to teach yourself
  • if your willing to ask for help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A. .
  • You will not get an easy A but if you pay attention in class and
  • , but he gives you a lot of time to complete it.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Risk

  • 75% of the class dropped the course
  • DO NOT RECCOMEND THIS PROFESSOR
  • If you dont like going to class and you would rather teach yourself the material, this class is for you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 in-person reviews over many years with detailed and repeated themes, though opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 57
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 520

Course coverage

MATH4315 reviews
MATH6513 reviews
MATH374 reviews
MTH434 reviews
MATH43STATS2 reviews
Show 12 more courses
212081 review
MATH11 review
MATH131 review
MATH201 review
MATH531 review
MATH53A1 review
MATH551 review
MATH55A1 review
MATH65A1 review
MATHSTAT1 review
MTH551 review
STATS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1