AI Rate Professor

Electronic Engineering Technol

Frank Ko

NEC207A · INDT74 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you have no better option and can tolerate repetitive work, uneven teaching, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teacherHeavy homeworkRepetitive quizzesClear grading for someRude demeanor concerns
  • Three of four reviews are strongly negative, citing .
  • and and online quizzes helped learning and grades.
  • The course may produce A grades, but student satisfaction and teaching quality are very inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A grades appear possible if , but the work can be repetitive, heavy, and frustrating.

The online review suggests a hard path to a C, while on effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content itself is not described as intellectually extreme, but repetitive teaching and .

Online evidence makes the course feel much harder due to workload, while learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

One in-person tag says skipping class means you will not pass, but the comments do not clearly prove a .

Attendance evidence appears only in .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most reviews advise against taking him because of .

The online review is strongly avoidant, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Most recorded grades are A, but the and the student received a C.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is negative, while .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews , and a lot of assigned work.

Format shift

The online review is the strongest workload warning, and and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The positive review praises his help, but most reviews criticize his teaching style, repetition, demeanor, or limited technical command.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is negative, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and online quizzes, so assessment leans quiz-heavy but not exam-only.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes quizzes and homework, while and online quiz attempts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

review and two harsh negative reviews about teaching style and demeanor.

Main concern

The main concern is polarizing teaching quality and possible rude or repetitive instruction.

What students said

“Professor Ko is awesome.”
INDT74
“Has authoritarian & rude demeanor.”
INDT74

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and , and irritating lectures.

Main concern

The main concern is an overwhelming and poorly managed workload.

What students said

“Instructor Ko gives entirely way too much homework that he couldn't even keep up with.”
NEC207A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or final policies.

Online QuizzesRepetitive QuizzesPop QuizzesMultiple Quiz Attempts

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention pop quizzes and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Pop QuizzesOnline QuizzesMultiple Quiz Attempts
“ and you have 3 tries to improve.”
INDT74
“Beware of pop quizzes”
INDT74

Online

The online review mentions too many repetitive quizzes, but does not clearly prove proctoring, .

Repetitive Quizzes
“ and lectures and were seriously irritating.”
NEC207A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the type of class you take if you have no other option.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized recommendations. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Has authoritarian & rude demeanor.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“Instructor Ko gives entirely way too much homework that he couldn't even keep up with.”

👍 Recommendation Level

30/100

“ and you'll wish you'd dropped him with the quickness.”

⚖️ Grading And Quizzes

50/100

“ and you have 3 tries to improve.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Ko is awesome.
  • Has authoritarian & rude demeanor.
  • His technical knowledge appears to be limited & has plateaued prior to the level of courses he teaches.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Quizzes

  • Instructor Ko gives entirely way too much homework that he couldn't even keep up with.
  • and lectures and were seriously irritating.
  • and you have 3 tries to improve.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Value

  • You would get a good grade if you do all the .
  • I learned a lot from doing the assignment.
  • academic challenge & those satisfied with mediocrity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews are available, and opinions are sharply split and teaching style.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

INDT743 reviews
NEC207A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values