AI Rate Professor

English

Deborah Stevens

ENG1A · ENGL1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider her only if you are comfortable participating actively and tracking your own submitted work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teacherParticipation mattersUnclear lecturesGrade entry issuesMixed guidance
  • , and they sharply conflict on teaching quality.
  • One student praises her as inspirational, while and wasted time.
  • There is a specific warning to keep proof of homework because grade entry may be incorrect.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Two reported high grades suggest an A is possible, but students still need to do the work and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course does not sound conceptually extreme, but and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters is mentioned, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends on whether students connect with her style, since reviews range .

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades can be good, but students should keep proof of .

Format shift

, and the evidence is limited.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as overwhelming, but participation and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, so there is no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

because one review is highly positive and another strongly criticizes her lecture style.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they strongly conflict.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and participation than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are limited and split between strong praise, severe criticism, and a .

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent classroom clarity and .

What students said

“She is an extremely great teacher.”
ENGL1A
“All the students in the class didn't know what was going on.”
ENG1A
“keep all your homework sometimes it is entered incorrectly or not at all”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All the students in the class didn't know what was going on.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting limited evidence on teaching clarity, participation, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“She is an extremely great teacher.”

⚠️ Classroom Clarity

45/100

“Prof. Stevens often goes several minutes without speaking in lecture”

📝

52/100

“keep all your homework sometimes it is entered incorrectly or not at all”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is an extremely great teacher.
  • All the students in the class didn't know what was going on.
  • I often felt that my time was being wasted

Theme 2

📌 About Work & Grades

  • Those who complain refuse to do the class work
  • keep all your homework sometimes it is entered incorrectly or not at all
  • if you let her know that you did it and submit proof she will fix it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

36/100

Evidence confidence

limited and conflicting evidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1A2 reviews
ENG1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values