AI Rate Professor

English

Monica Olmedo

ENG1A · ENG410281 · ENGL1 · ENG102 · ENGL4 · ENG4 · ENLG063 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you can manage a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized deadlinesHeavy reading and papersSlow gradingMixed teaching qualityPop quizzes
  • Online feedback is positive, but the and often negative.
  • The main complaints are disorganization, , and too much work.
  • Some students earned A grades, but many describe the path as stressful and poorly structured.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A grades are possible, but students describe heavy , and piled-up work.

The online review suggests an easy A, while through disorganization.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content itself may not be very hard, but poor organization and .

Online evidence makes the class seem easy, while by structure problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not give a , though one tag warns that skipping class can hurt performance.

, while in-person comments imply participation and class presence can matter.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

38/100

Recommendation is low because many students report , and .

The single online review recommends her, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some students call grading easygoing, but repeated complaints , and poor feedback lower confidence in fairness.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is minimal, while in-person reviews give conflicting but .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and work piling up near the end.

Format shift

The online review does not mention workload, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive comments about helpfulness are outweighed by repeated claims of disorganization, , and .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, while and detailed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize essays, , and pop quizzes more than major exams.

Format shift

, while the online review gives none.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but often criticize disorganization, heavy , and .

Main concern

Students may face confusing due dates, heavy work, and .

What students said

“ .”
ENG4
“The second half of the class had twice as much work piled up and there is .”
ENGL4
“ .”
ENG410281

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is positive and and available.

Main concern

The online evidence is only one review and conflicts with the broader in-person pattern.

What students said

“She is so and .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students mention pop quizzes, but reviews do not clearly prove midterm, final, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Pop QuizzesExam policy mostly unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove broader exam rules or .

Pop Quizzes
“There were a .”
ENLG063
“A lot of class discussions, book quizzes, and essays.”
ENGL4

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Load

22/100

“The second half of the class had twice as much work piled up and there is .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

38/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so and .
  • .
  • She definitely lacks experience as a teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of reading and work!
  • Try's to do 12 weeks of work in 6.
  • She pilled up all work toward the last 3 weeks of class.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • Pretty easygoing with the grading though.
  • there is .
  • she does not give feedback on papers well for the students to improve

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across online and and consistent concerns, despite one positive online outlier.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGL43 reviews
ENG1022 reviews
ENG42 reviews
ENG1A1 review
ENG4102811 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGL11 review
ENLG0631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1