AI Rate Professor

Biology

Rebecca Otto

BIOLOGY6 · MICR1 · BIOL10 · BIO6 · BIO2A · BIO10 · BIO1 · BIOL6 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want to learn biology seriously and , and consistent studying.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful but demandingTest heavyReading heavyTough graderBiology-focused
  • Otto is often described as , and passionate, especially by students who care about biology.
  • The course is consistently demanding, with , and major memorization expectations.
  • Grades are possible with steady effort, but students looking for an easy biology requirement may be frustrated.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Students can earn high grades, but most comments say an A requires , and test preparation.

Online reviews emphasize self-directed work and , while In person reviews show A potential but only with consistent effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The biology content is memorization-heavy, detailed, fast at times, and often described as hard or only for serious students.

Online comments call the work self-directed and application-based, while In and dense lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because tests follow lecture details and notes may omit key information.

Online reviews do not describe attendance rules, while In .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her for learning and support, but the workload, exam difficulty, and .

Online recommendation is mixed due to heavy work, while In person reviews are mostly positive for motivated biology students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

but not hopeless, with detailed tests, tough grading comments, occasional curves, dropped scores, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention hard grading and , while In person if students prepare.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is heavy because students report lots of , and extensive studying for detailed exams.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly describe heavy weekly reading and labs, while In , and studying.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often , and passionate, though some find lectures rushed, boring, disorganized, or too independent.

Format shift

but stress self-teaching, while In person reviews more often praise her help and subject knowledge.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are heavily exam-centered, with frequent mentions of exams, lab practicals, quizzes, and projects supporting test preparation.

Format shift

, while In person reviews repeatedly describe multiple exams and lab exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

class is lecture-heavy, test-heavy, and best for students willing to study and attend regularly.

Main concern

, and photo or lab projects can make the class hard.

What students said

“If you put in the time and effort you will do great.”
BIO6
“Otto is a .”
BIO6
“Toughest course I've ever taken. ONLY for serious Bio majors.”
BIO6

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a straightforward but heavy asynchronous course with lots of , and application-based testing.

Main concern

Students must teach themselves a lot of material and manage a heavy weekly workload.

What students said

“she gives so much work!!”
BIO6
“Online work was .”
BIOL6
“you NEED to take good notes on your own to pass this class.”
BIOL6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews describe , and application-based testing, but proctoring and book policy are not clearly proven.

Timed Canvas ExamsApplication-Based QuestionsDetailed ExamsLab ExamsPolicy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews describe detailed and difficult exams, multiple exams, and lab practicals, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Detailed ExamsMultiple ExamsLab ExamsMemorization Heavy
“Otto is a .”
BIO6
“ though.”
BIOLOGY6
“There are 4 exams, 2 lab exams, 2 photo projects and lots of hw”
BIO6

Online

and application-based questions, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Timed Canvas ExamsApplication-Based QuestionsHeavy Exam Weight
“She grades hard and .”
BIO6
“ so much definition, they're application.”
BIOL6
“ .”
BIOL6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the time and effort you will do great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Otto is sensational.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“she gives so much work!!”

🧪

35/100

“ though.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

76/100

“Good teacher, knows her stuff, but the material is hard and she doesn't let up.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Otto is sensational.
  • She is very encouraging and really wants her students to succeed.
  • She's very willing to help her students; you just need to put in your part and go to her.
  • She really leaves it up to you to learn the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you put in the time and effort you will do great.
  • Otto is a .
  • Good professor, good class. ; expect a lot of studying to get an A.
  • Its impossible not to get an A.

Theme 3

📝

  • She gives about 4 sections of .
  • .
  • There are 4 exams, 2 lab exams, 2 photo projects and lots of hw
  • DONT PUT OFF THE PHOTO PROJECT

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 34 reviews span many years, include detailed course descriptions, and show consistent themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 512
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO618 reviews
BIO2A7 reviews
BIOL64 reviews
BIO11 review
BIO101 review
Show 3 more courses
BIOL101 review
BIOLOGY61 review
MICR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 3

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1