AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ming Lun

MTH122 · MATH1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you are highly prepared for difficult math with heavy workload and limited teaching support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery hardLots of homeworkPoor explanationsTough gradingNot recommended
  • Both reviewers failed, making the grade risk extremely high.
  • Comments describe a heavy workload and difficult math courses.
  • Teaching feedback is sharply split, but the and skipped steps.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Both reviewed students received F grades, and comments , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Calculus and math content are presented as very difficult, especially because .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

A review tag says skipping class means you will not pass, so if no formal policy is stated.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

, and the most detailed review directly warns students not to take him for teaching.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Both reported grades are F, and one review tags him as a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Both reviews or and a demanding semester.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

One reviewer respected his feedback, but the detailed negative review .

Format shift

, and the comments conflict but lean negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention lots of homework but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a very hard math experience with and major grade risk.

Main concern

Students , and unclear calculus instruction.

What students said

“Buckle up. One hell of a semester.”
MTH122
“Ming Lun could not put together a coherent thought, let alone explain anything to us about how to do calculus.”
MATH1
“He literally told us he was skipping steps and that we were supposed to already know what he was doing.”
MATH1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ming Lun could not put together a coherent thought, let alone explain anything to us about how to do calculus.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grade risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“His lectures were always dragging and .”

📈 Grade Risk

8/100

“Buckle up. One hell of a semester.”

⚖️ Workload Pressure

22/100

“He literally told us he was skipping steps and that we were supposed to already know what he was doing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ming Lun could not put together a coherent thought, let alone explain anything to us about how to do calculus.
  • His lectures were always dragging and .
  • Ming Lin is a smart guy, but when it comes to teaching... don't.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Buckle up. One hell of a semester.
  • He literally told us he was skipping steps and that we were supposed to already know what he was doing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and their quality ratings conflict sharply despite consistent difficulty and grade risk.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH11 review
MTH1221 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values