AI Rate Professor

Psychology & Sociology

Thuyland Roulland

MATH37 · MATH1 · MATH55 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are prepared to teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor ExplanationsSelf StudyLots of HomeworkHard to UnderstandNot Recommended
  • Students say and not helpful.
  • The workload is heavy relative to the support provided.
  • Recommendation sentiment is strongly negative across all reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and weak instructional support.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The material feels hard because and students say they must learn topics on their own.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students strongly advise against taking her because , and difficult to understand.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grades and comments suggest a tough experience, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students explicitly mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews repeatedly , and students must teach themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

and tests, but do not provide enough detail to prove an .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently , and poor support.

Main concern

Students report needing to learn material mostly on their own.

What students said

“Basically, she didn't teach.”
MATH55
“Lots of .”
MATH1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a lost test but do not clearly .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clear
“ and denied losing it!”
MATH37

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She expected us to learn the material on our own. Basically, she didn't teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Lots of .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Can be hard to understand her and not the .
  • She expected us to learn the material on our own.
  • I never understood any topics she went over.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of .
  • She jus does problems straight from the book and the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Try to refrain from taking this teacher.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but their negative teaching and workload complaints are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH11 review
MATH371 review
MATH551 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values