AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Sandy Luong

COS128 · POLISCI7 · POLISCI33040 · POSC1 · POLI7 · POSC1ON1 · POL1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if possible, and if you can handle fast, lecture-heavy political science courses.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear FeedbackLecture HeavyReading HeavyMixed ClarityTough In Person
  • Online reviews are strongly positive, with , and manageable assignments.
  • In-person reviews are split between engaging, rigorous teaching and .
  • Getting an A looks possible, but and stricter expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic with effort, but , and dropped courses.

, while in-person evidence shows more work and higher risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is manageable online but becomes challenging in person because lectures are dense and fast.

Online reviews emphasize organization, while and clarity problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several in-person tags warn that skipping class can hurt passing, while .

, and online reviews do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students recommend her when they value learning and structure, but .

Online reviews are consistently positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

She is described as fair and sometimes rounds grades, but .

Format shift

, while and more polarizing.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and enough material to feel heavy in person.

Format shift

Online work seems manageable with readings, while because lectures carry a lot of material.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and organization, but negative in-person reviews cite unclear and rushed lectures.

Format shift

Online teaching is consistently praised, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews , and test-heavy tags, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, quizzes, and assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with some praising her rigor and and .

Main concern

Fast lecture delivery and .

What students said

“The class is lecture heavy bc there is a lot of material”
POLISCI7
“If !”
POLISCI33040
“She doesn't even give enough time to write notes.”
POLI7

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe a , and fair grading.

Main concern

, and the textbook may matter for understanding videos.

What students said

“there was only a 6? and a couple of quizzes.”
POL1
“She has alot of lecture videos which I loved.”
POSC1ON1
“Love the structure of the class, but lots of readings.”
POSC1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and test-heavy courses, but .

Quizzes MentionedTest Heavy TagsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture-heavy concerns, but comments do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy TagsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“She doesn't even give enough time to write notes.”
POLI7

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Quizzes MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“there was only a 6? and a couple of quizzes.”
POL1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If !”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She is very knowledgeable. You can tell she loves what she does.”

⚖️

58/100

“In the ”

📚 Course Challenge

50/100

“She goes on talking, expecting everyone to understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She really knows what shes talking about & cares a lot about us learning the material.
  • Her method of teaching is dull and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a as well.
  • The class is lecture heavy bc there is a lot of material
  • because i knew i would fail since the beginning.

Theme 3

💬 About Student Fit

  • If you wanna really learn .
  • If !
  • Definitely did not feel comfortable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across both formats provide useful detail, but the evidence is older and sharply split by format.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

POLI72 reviews
POSC12 reviews
COS1281 review
POL11 review
POLISCI330401 review
Show 2 more courses
POLISCI71 review
POSC1ON11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1