AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Neeta Sharma

CHEM30A · CHEM1B · CHEM1A · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself chemistry and and difficult exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized teachingHard examsPoor communicationUnhelpful supportAvoid warning
  • Most students describe Sharma as .
  • Chemistry exams and as hard or poorly aligned with preparation.
  • A , but the overall recommendation pattern is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A strong student can succeed by reading and , but , and weak guidance.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Chemistry content becomes more difficult because and .

All course-easiness evidence is in person, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention her being late, but they do not clearly establish a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because they describe poor teaching, poor communication, and hard or unfair exams.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Reviews , and difficult midterms, despite a few positive comments about straightforward tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is not the main complaint, but , and test preparation still require steady effort.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most reviews describe unclear explanations, disorganization, lateness, poor support, and bad communication.

Format shift

All teaching-quality evidence is in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments repeatedly emphasize quizzes, midterms, tests, labs, and .

Format shift

All assessment evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing , and inconsistent communication.

Main concern

Students say they often had to figure material out without useful guidance.

What students said

“Terrible teacher.”
CHEM1A
“ .”
CHEM1A
“All the tests and .”
CHEM1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or .

Hard MidtermsQuiz-Based PreparationBook-Based TestsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests as central, with several students calling the exams hard or poorly aligned.

Hard MidtermsTests From BookExams Based On QuizzesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“ quizzes' format.”
CHEM1A
“ .”
20060
“ of the book.”
CHEM1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ .”

🧪

28/100

“ quizzes' format.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Terrible teacher.
  • .
  • She's bad at explaining things.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • quizzes' format.
  • .
  • of the book.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • Ms. Sharma never had time to answer questions.
  • Office hours are not for helping students.
  • enough with questions figure it out yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed in-person reviews across several years show a consistent negative pattern with a small minority of positive counterexamples.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CHEM1A7 reviews
CHEM1B3 reviews
200601 review
CHEM30A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1