AI Rate Professor

English

Ingrid Hufgard

ENG101B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGL102 · ENGLI1001 · ENGLISH1A · ENGL101B · ENG102 · ENGL04 · ENGLISH · ENGL07 · ESL110C · ENGLISH102 · ENGL1001 · ENG101A · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you want intense English preparation and and confusing instructions.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery tough graderConfusing explanationsHeavy writing workloadHelpful feedbackStrict attendance
  • Many students describe her as , and hard to understand.
  • as picky, strict, and difficult for essays.
  • and preparation, but only hardworking English-focused students seem to benefit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

An A appears very hard because students , and unclear expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content is writing-heavy and becomes harder because instructions and .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Several reviews suggest strict attendance consequences, including being dropped for missing class or leaving.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend her because strict grading and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students , and makes high grades very difficult.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention lots of , and frequent in-class work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

, but many describe her as , and unclear.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears , and reading rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

mixed teaching value and frequent complaints about clarity.

Main concern

Students often struggle with and .

What students said

“This professor is a , but .”
ENGLISH1A
“she never goes into detail on what to do, leaving you confused on how to write a certain essay”
ENGL101B
“She is a and lots of HW, essays and note taking.”
ENG102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and writing work, but they .

Exam policy not clearly provenQuizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and writing tasks, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or book policy.

Quizzes mentionedExam policy not clearly proven
“ she went over the last course.”
ENG101A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a and lots of HW, essays and note taking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She's not a very helpful teacher, and is hard to understand.”

⚖️

10/100

“Will find some sort of .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“She is a and lots of HW, essays and note taking.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“I don't recomend this .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and she is not very organized everything is all over the place.
  • Shes and your grades suffer because of it.
  • This professor is a , but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you make just a tiny mistake on an .
  • AND IT SEEMS THAT GETTING EVEN A B IN HER CLASS IS IMPOSSIBLE.
  • Even though she is extremely picky, she is a great teacher.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • .
  • Very helpful and nice but don't get fooled.
  • You can email her day and night and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 30 in-person reviews span many years and repeat the and .

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG1026 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENG101A2 reviews
ENG101B2 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENGL042 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
ENGLISH1022 reviews
0031 review
10011 review
ENGL071 review
ENGL10011 review
ENGL101B1 review
ENGLI10011 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ESL110C1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1