AI Rate Professor

History

Ken Gleason

HISTMDAG · HST7 · HISTORY2 · HIST8 · HIS8 · HISTORY · HIST2 · HIST1 · HIST7 · HISTORY8 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from readings and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesTough testsUnclear expectationsHeavy readingHarsh grading
  • Most students criticize the lectures as rambling, boring, and hard to use for studying.
  • Tests and as , and harshly graded.
  • A few students found him knowledgeable and manageable with reading, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A appears possible for a few prepared students, but most comments , and poor guidance.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The history content itself is not always advanced, but poor lecture clarity and .

Only in-person reviews describe difficulty, and they focus more on delivery and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because tests and lectures drive grades, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because and assessments feel difficult or poorly explained.

and strongly negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many students , and point deductions for strict formatting expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The class , and multiple difficult tests.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students repeatedly call the , and disconnected from exams.

Format shift

All and is mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly emphasize tests and midterms, with essays as another major component.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and low classroom engagement.

Main concern

The main concern is that lectures often do not prepare students well for difficult tests and essays.

What students said

“lectures are long and doesn't tell you what you need to know”
HIST7
“ ”
HIST8
“HIS LECUTRE SUCKS AND IS BORING, AND DO NOT APPEAR ON THE TEST.”
HISTORY2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and , but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsMultiple MidtermsPop QuizzesEssay Requirements

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult tests and several exam-heavy structures, but .

Hard TestsMultiple MidtermsPop Quizzes
“ ”
HIST8
“ and long ( 100 questions each ).”
HIST8
“He ”
HIST7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“lectures are long and doesn't tell you what you need to know, essays are given with extremely hard to navigate. do not take his class”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He stands up there and talks all class period with few visuals.”

🧪

24/100

“ ”

⚖️

20/100

“Pay close attention to his instructions or .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Rambles on.
  • Lectures are boring.
  • Poor and boring.

Theme 2

📚

  • Most of the
  • He also gives two mandatory essays based on an entire book without reminding you to read it.
  • .

Theme 3

👍 Positive Outliers

  • He's a very insightful man.
  • Not a bad teacher, he grades on a
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

sample with consistent negative themes despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 513

Course coverage

HIST88 reviews
HIST74 reviews
HIS83 reviews
HIST13 reviews
HISTORY22 reviews
Show 5 more courses
HISTORY82 reviews
HIST21 review
HISTMDAG1 review
HISTORY1 review
HST71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values