AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Keary Kensinger

A14 · HUMN60 · HUM50 · HUMAN65 · 32460HUMN60 · ARCH14 · HUM45ARCHT14 · PHIL · ARCH2 · HUMANAMER · 31616ARCH14 · HUMN65 · HMNR65 · ARCH · 102 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
89.47%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a challenging, immersive humanities or architecture class and will show up fully prepared.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational lecturesMandatory participationField trip heavyOld school testingRespect and effort required
  • Most students find his classes memorable, passionate, and perspective-changing.
  • Success depends heavily on attendance, participation, note-taking, field trips, and consistent study.
  • A minority of students struggle with , and limited direct help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Many students earn A grades by attending, participating, studying, and doing field work, but the class is not a low-effort A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

49/100

The material is engaging but can be because of , and abstract thinking.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance and field trips are repeatedly described as required, and missing class can make students fall behind.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Most students strongly recommend him for passionate, transformative teaching, though some warn his style is demanding and unclear.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students describe him as firm but fair, with good outcomes for those who show effort and participate.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Workload includes frequent quizzes, field trips, participation, films, notes, group work, and projects or books.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews praise his passion and impact, but several students find him unclear, , or unhelpful.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to mix quizzes, tests, field trip work, participation, films, group projects, and written or book assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe an intense, old-school, highly engaging , and participation.

Main concern

Students who miss class, skip field trips, or expect .

What students said

“This was the most rewarding class! , and hard work are required, but you will never look at a city the same way again.”
ARCH14
“ but if you attend class and pay attention, you'll be fine.”
HUMN60
“i do not think he is a good teacher. REALLY DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW.”
ARCH14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Testing is old-school and study-heavy with quizzes and non-multiple-choice tests, but reviews do .

Non-Multiple-Choice TestsFrequent QuizzesFilm QuizzesField Trip TestsStudy Required

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention frequent quizzes, non-multiple-choice tests, and tests on films or field trips, but .

Non-Multiple-Choice TestsFrequent QuizzesFilm QuizzesField Trip Tests
“The , but I found paying attention in class and study the materials works wonders.”
HUMN60
“There are .”
HUMN60
“Even if we have a field trip we still have a two weeks ago..”
PHIL

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the most rewarding class! , and hard work are required, but you will never look at a city the same way again.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He challenges you, supports you, and inspires you.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

87/100

“Mr. K is an excellent instructor who is very passionate about architecture and the arts.”

⚠️

12/100

“If you miss ANY classes u will fall behind.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hooked from the very first lecture!It made me see the world differently.
  • Mr K. is one of the most passionate professors I have ever had the pleasure to be educated by.
  • he opened my eyes to the unique ways humans make meaning out of their lives.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Work

  • DON'T SLACK OFF! Show RESPECT... You'll get it later.
  • You will need to study, you will need to participate, but .
  • Attendance and the completion of the book are required to pass.

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Format

  • The field trips were great , he knows his architecture and wants you to learn.
  • FIELD .
  • but if you attend class and pay attention, you'll be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

102

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 in-person reviews across many years with rich detail and a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 584
4 out of 512
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ARCH1418 reviews
HUMN6013 reviews
HUMN654 reviews
32460HUMN602 reviews
A142 reviews
Show 9 more courses
HUM45ARCHT142 reviews
HUMAN652 reviews
31616ARCH141 review
ARCH1 review
ARCH21 review
HMNR651 review
HUM501 review
HUMANAMER1 review
PHIL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 5 · A 12

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3