AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

David Van Brasch

A6 · ATEC6A · ATEC50 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want strong automotive knowledge and can handle a self-driven, sometimes dry class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeableHelpful in labsRequires self-effortDry lecturesAutomotive expertise
  • He knows the auto technology material deeply and .
  • Students who apply themselves can learn a lot, but he does not carry passive learners.
  • Lecture delivery is sometimes dry, monotone, and not very interactive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Grades look reachable, but comments stress that students must apply themselves and work for success.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course covers a lot of automotive material and requires thinking, but the concepts are manageable with effort.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students would take him again because he is knowledgeable and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades appear fair rather than generous, with success tied to applying yourself.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Students mention lots of material but not an .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is knowledgeable and , but lecture delivery can be dry and unengaging.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews emphasize lectures, labs, and learning material, but .

Format shift

, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe strong subject knowledge and and a need for student effort.

Main concern

The main concern is dry, less interactive lecture delivery.

What students said

“ and cares about every student learning the material.”
A6
“Lots of material to cover.”
ATEC50
“Lectures are very dry and monotone.”
ATEC6A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Students need to apply themselves with Mr. Van Brasch.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, labs, and effort. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Mr. Van Brasch is extremely knowledgeable about the auto subject matter.”

⚖️ Effort Required

56/100

“you get out of the course what you put in to it!”

⚠️ Lecture Style

48/100

“Lectures are very dry and monotone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and encourage students to participate and ask questions.
  • if he was more interactive in presentations of material during lectures and labs.
  • Lectures are very dry and monotone.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Effort

  • Lots of material to cover.
  • Students need to apply themselves with Mr. Van Brasch.
  • So apply yourself for success!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed but older reviews give a consistent mixed picture, though exam and policy details are limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ATEC6A2 reviews
A61 review
ATEC501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values