AI Rate Professor

Early Childhood Education

Barbara Ogman

ECD68 · ECD · ECD55 · ECD56 · ECD90 · ECD62 · ECD50 · EDC50 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take Ogman if you can attend consistently and work independently, but if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable but strictLots of reading and papersAttendance mattersMixed helpfulnessStrong in-class discussions
  • Students often learn a lot when they attend and keep up with readings.
  • , and studying rather than minimal effort.
  • Reviews split between engaging teaching and concerns about rudeness or limited help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is realistic, but students repeatedly say , and serious studying.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course content is not usually described as conceptually brutal, but and .

, and they show moderate difficulty tied to workload and attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students repeatedly say attending class is important, and one review says she is strict about tardiness and absence.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Many students value her knowledge and lectures, but the strong negative comments about rudeness and support make the recommendation mixed.

, so the recommendation reflects that format only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades seem fair but demanding, with strict expectations for , and citations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention lots of reading, papers, observations, and assignments across several courses.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

She is often described as knowledgeable and engaging, but several students say she can be rude, off topic, or not helpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and finals.

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe the assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable teacher whose classes can be rewarding but , and .

Main concern

Students report , and occasional rudeness when asking for help.

What students said

“ are not that hard but you will need to work really hard to earn a good grade.”
ECD62
“You must be able to learn on your own to pass.”
ECD50
“As long as you were in class and listened you will pass the tests.”
ECD50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear study-based and sometimes open notes, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Open Notes MentionedTests Require StudyingMidterms MentionedFinals Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one open-notes test, but do not prove a .

Open Notes MentionedTests Require StudyingMidterms Mentioned
“ but open notes.”
ECD50
“There are 3 observations and two tests.”
EDC50
“ but you will need to work really hard to earn a good grade.”
ECD62

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Follow directions and you will be successful. Lots of work but rewarding.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Amazing lectures. You can learn a lot from her.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“There was a LOT of reading required.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

55/100

“you will need to work really hard to earn a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent teacher, very dynamic classes.
  • and passionate about her subject.
  • She spends the entire class off topic and can be rude when answers questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is pretty easy if you attend every class and do your observations.
  • Follow directions and you will be successful.
  • Not very helpful but if .

Theme 3

🕒

  • The class was only hard if you didn't attend it.
  • She is very strict about being tarty and absence.
  • As long as your in class every day and pay attention you will pass the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen in-person reviews over many years , and teaching style.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ECD507 reviews
ECD624 reviews
ECD1 review
ECD551 review
ECD561 review
Show 3 more courses
ECD681 review
ECD901 review
EDC501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1