AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ray Westergard

ANTHROPOLOGY · MATH · MATH55 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

unless you are comfortable with limited evidence and can learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSparse evidenceMixed organizationCurve gradingExtra creditSerious conduct complaint
  • The review set is very small and old, so confidence is limited.
  • One detailed recent review reports severe classroom conduct concerns, which heavily lowers recommendation value.
  • Older comments describe him as , and offering curve grading or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

The course appears grade-friendly because of and , but evidence is too limited to call it an easy A.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but one comment says , so students may need the book.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online evidence exists, and policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The small dataset includes a severe conduct complaint and no positive recent recommendation signal.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

and , but the evidence is thin.

Format shift

, and online evidence is absent.

Workload

Light

68/100

Low difficulty ratings suggest a lighter workload, but the reviews .

Format shift

, and they do not describe workload consistently.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Older comments mention humor and organization, but the most detailed review reports serious negative classroom behavior and another says lectures were not always helpful.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe the and .

Format shift

No online assessment evidence exists, and in-person evidence is vague.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is sparse and mixed, with one severe negative review and older comments , and .

Main concern

The most detailed review reports hostile and inappropriate classroom behavior.

What students said

“Ray Westergard singled out many for abuse.”
MATH55
“ ”
MATH
“grades off the curve. gives opportunities. .”
MATH55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting limited but important themes in , and classroom conduct. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Classroom Experience

25/100

“Ray Westergard singled out many for abuse.”

📚 Teaching Helpfulness

38/100

“read the book, ”

⚖️

75/100

“grades off the curve. gives opportunities. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • funny guy.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • grades off the curve.
  • gives opportunities.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Conduct

  • Ray Westergard singled out many for abuse.
  • Ray Westergard took every opportunity to make snide remarks and send nasty looks in my direction.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews are available, most are very old, and the evidence is too sparse for high confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH552 reviews
ANTHROPOLOGY1 review
MATH1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1