AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Slutz Baranouskas

ENGR22 · ENG22 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and handling a frustrating lab-heavy class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesDisorganized instructionPoor lab supportHeavy workloadSelf-teaching required
  • Most students describe lectures as rambling, rushed, and .
  • Students repeatedly say the material is not always hard, but her teaching makes it much harder.
  • Success depends on self-teaching, working from the textbook, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earned A grades, but reviews say passing requires self-teaching, heavy effort, and working outside class.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The CAD material itself is often described as manageable, but rushed and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they separate manageable content from poor delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do , though lab time appears important.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students advise avoiding her because , and the class feels harder than necessary.

Recommendation and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Grades are possible with major effort, but comments , and many students struggling or dropping.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students mention , and difficulty finishing assignments during class.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The dominant pattern is disorganized, rambling, rushed instruction with poor responses to student questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews focus on CAD labs, worksheets, homework, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about rambling lectures, rushed instruction, weak help, and .

Main concern

Students because class time is spent on long lectures instead of .

What students said

“ and about 80 of the lecture time is unnecessary reminders and hot air and the other 20 of the time, she races through the important things”
ENGR22
“ ”
ENG22
“The material isn't hard but her instruction makes it that way.”
ENGR22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , while proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, and finals are not clearly proven.

Take-Home Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, midterms, or .

Take-Home Quizzes
“Beware of .”
ENGR22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The material isn't hard but her instruction makes it that way.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ ! AND NOT A GOOD TEACHER.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ ”

📚 Workload

24/100

“very hard lots of people dropped, the end of the class was hard and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and about 80 of the lecture time is unnecessary reminders and hot air and the other 20 of the time, she races through the important things
  • She spends almost the entire class talking, then squeezes in the .
  • ! AND NOT A GOOD TEACHER.
  • She doesn't teach very well overall...but if you do all the work and try to pay attention, you should be fine.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Be diligent and work hard and you will succeed.
  • It's not hard but she makes it.
  • The material isn't hard but her instruction makes it that way.
  • To pass the class you have to give it all you got and work out of the text book as much as you can.

Theme 3

🧪 About Labs And Workload

  • she lectures forever so .
  • .
  • the .
  • if you don't, you're going to have trouble finishing the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews over several years show a consistent pattern of poor instruction, heavy effort, and low recommendation.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGR229 reviews
ENG225 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1