AI Rate Professor

Physics

Chandra Vanajakshi

ASTR10 · ASTR100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are and the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear LecturesLow EngagementConfusing CommunicationSelf-Study RequiredUnhelpful
  • and poor engagement.
  • Students say important information and explanations are .
  • and textbook alignment are the main positives, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

The reviews do not mention easy grading, and confusion around lectures and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The material feels difficult because and students report getting lost during lectures.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person astronomy reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students strongly discourage the class because , and not helpful.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

There is , but and poor guidance make earning grades feel harder.

Format shift

and comes from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, so students may need extra independent study beyond class.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Reviews consistently describe her as , and difficult to understand.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, while exams are not discussed.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, describing unclear lectures, weak engagement, and a .

Main concern

Students may because .

What students said

“She is not very clear with deadlines, dates, or important information.”
ASTR100
“She doesn't do anything to keep people engaged and interested during lectures.”
ASTR100
“i get lost its like taking another languge”
ASTR10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is not very clear with deadlines, dates, or important information.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, engagement, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She doesn't do anything to keep people engaged and interested during lectures.”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

28/100

“She is not very clear with deadlines, dates, or important information.”

📚

34/100

“when she lectures its all out of the book so you can just go home and read the chaper”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't do anything to keep people engaged and interested during lectures.
  • i get lost its like taking another languge
  • but .

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Clarity

  • .
  • She is not very clear with deadlines, dates, or important information.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two reviews across a long time span, though both are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASTR101 review
ASTR1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values