AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Adrienne Colomino

MATH43 · STATS43 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless and tolerate a stressful, attendance-dependent class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMandatory AttendanceWeekly HomeworkTough TestsWeak TeachingLenient Passing
  • Students describe the class as , and packed with , and tests.
  • Teaching quality is a major concern because one student says she does not know the material well and makes mistakes.
  • Passing may be , but students may not learn much.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Passing may be easy because grading can be lenient, but earning an A likely , and attendance.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels challenging because students report heavy stress, missed material after one absence, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

as mandatory, and missing one day means missing a lot.

, and the evidence says it is mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because the class is stressful and one review says students may pass without learning much.

Recommendation and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

because one review says she is lenient, while another calls her a .

Format shift

and is conflicting.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is heavy because students mention , and high stress.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is weak because one student reports wrong examples and poor command of the material.

Format shift

Both reviews are in person, with one neutral-stress review and one strongly negative teaching review.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and likely lecture-based work, so it is not purely exam-based.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a stressful statistics class with , and weak instruction.

Main concern

Students may pass, but they report poor learning, hard work, and .

What students said

“ .”
STATS43
“she's lenient .”
MATH43
“It's easy to pass her class but you won't learn much.”
MATH43

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but do not clearly prove book rules, final format, or proctoring requirements.

Quizzes From LecturesTestsNo Clear Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and later tests, but does not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or .

Lecture QuizzesTestsTough Grader
“There will be quizzes from .”
STATS43

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's easy to pass her class but you won't learn much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She doesn't really know her materials that well.”

📈 Easy A Potential

52/100

“It's easy to pass her class but you won't learn much.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't really know her materials that well.
  • There's times when she would do her examples wrong
  • you won't learn much.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You must really work hard in this class.
  • she's lenient .
  • There will be quizzes from .

Theme 3

🕒

  • .
  • Miss a day, you miss ALOT
  • If you're the type of person who can .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only , though both contain useful details about workload and teaching.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH431 review
STATS431 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1