AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ricardo Delgado

MATH65 · MTH43 · MTH31 · MATH31 · MTH65 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him if you want a , but if you struggle with pace.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient helperMakes math engagingClear explanationsSupportive after classSummer pace risk
  • Students consistently describe Delgado as patient, sincere, and .
  • The course content is still real math, but his pacing and .
  • One review reports a serious reliability issue when he stopped showing up, so the positive teaching record has a notable caution.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems possible with his support, but math still requires steady work and the evidence for .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

Students say math is hard, but Delgado's patience and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy, though .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and engaging, with one major reliability concern lowering confidence.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reviews give little direct grading evidence beyond one easy A comment and one C+ grade, so .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described as overwhelming, but summer pacing and with.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Most students praise his patience, sincerity, enthusiasm, and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions online assignments, while .

Format shift

, and exam evidence is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly praise his patience, enthusiasm, and .

Main concern

A summer class felt too fast, and one class was disrupted when he stopped attending.

What students said

“ and doesn’t move too fast at all.”
MATH65
“ felt like we understood.”
MTH31
“I took his class in the summer and .”
MATH31

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very patient and willing to go over problems over & over. Stays late after class to help out his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and pacing. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“ and doesn’t move too fast at all.”

👍 Student Support

82/100

“Very helpful and patient professor.”

⚠️ Course Risk

50/100

“I just couldn't keep up with the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • MR DELGADO MADE MATH FUN FOR ME.
  • .
  • Not a boring teacher at all!!

Theme 2

📘 About Difficulty

  • Math is hard! Mr. .
  • I took his class in the summer and .
  • I just couldn't keep up with the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • if you ask.
  • Stays late after class to help out his students.
  • felt like we understood.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews are consistent about teaching quality, but they are old and and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH653 reviews
MTH652 reviews
MATH311 review
MTH311 review
MTH431 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1