AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Phyllis Lee

MATHH55 · MAH20 · MATH · MATH40 · MATH37 · MATH65 · MATH1 · MTH20 · MATH20 · MATHSECT · ELEMALGEB · MATH55 · MATH31 · MATH001 · MATHCALC · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid Phyllis Lee unless you are already strong in math and can learn mostly from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard examsFast-paced lecturesHard to understandStrict gradingSelf-study required
  • and poor help with questions.
  • Grades depend heavily on difficult tests with little curve or .
  • A few students did well by studying the book independently, but most warn against taking her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears very hard because or , and several strong students struggled.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content is made , and exams that students say are harder than homework.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

least one review, though several students say attending is not very useful for learning.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students strongly discourage taking her because they find the and the tests punishing.

The recommendation pattern .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly , and grades based mostly on exams.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework is sometimes light or loosely checked, but because .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments describe rushed lectures, unclear speech or , and poor responses to questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews describe grades as , and final totaling 90 percent.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, , and .

Main concern

Students often say they cannot understand the lectures and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH20
“She rushes through the material.”
MATH37
“no extra creadit.... ”
MTH20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy, but they consistently .

Hard ExamsNo CurveNo Extra CreditExam-Heavy Grade

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and grades driven mostly by tests.

Hard ExamsNo CurveNo Extra CreditExam-Heavy Grade
“She does not grade on a curve and .”
MATH20
“no extra creadit.... ”
MTH20
“ and your grade is 75% worth of tests.”
MATH55

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Warning! ! You will end up regretting it if you do!”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“she doesn't know how to teach and 80% of students dropped her class.”

⚖️

15/100

“She does not grade on a curve and .”

📚

25/100

“stick to the book and u too might survive.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rushes through material.
  • she cannot teach at all.
  • Difficult to understand and to read her handwriting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and your grade is 75% worth of tests.
  • You better work your ass off if you want to get a B or higher.
  • almost 92% of the class failed first 2 tests and 80% dropped.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • .
  • Showing up to class is really pointless because she lacks the ability to actually teach.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 33 in-person reviews across many years with highly consistent complaints about teaching and exams.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH558 reviews
MATH207 reviews
MATH373 reviews
MATH402 reviews
MATHCALC2 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MTH202 reviews
ELEMALGEB1 review
MAH201 review
MATH1 review
MATH0011 review
MATH11 review
MATH311 review
MATH651 review
MATHH551 review
MATHSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values