AI Rate Professor

Biology

Will Wright

MICROBIO · MICROBIOLOGY1 · MIC1 · MICROBIOLOGY · MICRO · MICRO1 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and mainly want a survivable grade rather than a clear microbiology course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesHeavy curveNice but confusingSelf-teaching requiredMandatory attendance
  • Students often describe him as kind and approachable but very .
  • Grades because .
  • Microbiology and teaching yourself.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Getting an A is possible because of curves and , but students often need to self-teach and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The microbiology content is not described as impossible, but , and unpredictable tests make it harder than it should be.

, and they repeatedly mention confusion in lectures and labs.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory or strongly expected.

Only in-person reviews mention attendance, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

and accept poor organization in exchange for curved grades.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and several students report strong .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as extreme, but students must read, attend, study independently, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Many students say he is nice and knowledgeable but , and weak at explaining material.

Format shift

than instruction.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention lectures, labs, quizzes, and tests, with exams and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe a , and .

Main concern

Students may pass with a curve while .

What students said

“His lectures and .”
MICRO1
“Yes he does grade on a curve.”
MICRO1
“ ”
MICRO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest tests are often true-false and curved, but .

True-False TestsCurved ExamsUnclear Test Coverage

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test content that can feel unpredictable.

True-False TestsCurved ExamsUnclear Test Coverage
“ ”
MICRO1
“he does grade on a curve”
MICRO1
“Don't trust him when he says something is not on the test”
MICROBIOLOGY1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want A from micro w/ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“His lectures are not organized since he just goes over whatever is on the top of his head.”

📈 Grade Value

70/100

“Yes, you can get a decent grade in the class but that is only because .”

⚠️ Course Risk

42/100

“Stay away.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's nice as a person but so confusing and unorganized as a professor.
  • and unorganized making them .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A but I had to pretty
  • You will most likely get a .
  • !!!

Theme 3

🧪

  • , so they help little in understanding material.
  • Lot's of , but students still fail them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty in-person reviews across many years show a consistent pattern of , and self-teaching.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MICRO114 reviews
MICROBIOLOGY2 reviews
MIC11 review
MICRO1 review
MICROBIO1 review
Show 1 more courses
MICROBIOLOGY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values