AI Rate Professor

English

Doniella Maher

ENG102 · ENG1A · ENG013 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if you want a and are ready for and writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringRespectfulWriting-heavyFair timelinesInteresting readings
  • Students describe her as respectful, caring, and .
  • The , and group questions, so the class is not effortless.
  • Grading and pacing seem fair because students mention time, chances, and skill-based evaluation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

An A seems achievable with consistent work because the writing load is real but deadlines and as fair.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is not super easy because , and substantial reading, but students find it manageable and interesting.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and they do not clearly discuss attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students recommend her because , and gives fair chances despite the workload.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

and supportive because students mention chances, time, and skill-based essay evaluation rather than harsh penalties.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is heavy for four reviews, with repeated mentions of essays, journals, reading, and homework.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students consistently describe her as respectful, caring, helpful, and enjoyable to work with.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Assessment appears , and group questions rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

heavy but fair reading and writing expectations.

Main concern

The main challenge is the steady volume of essays, journals, and reading.

What students said

“she helps & gives a lot of time and chances.”
ENG102
“her class is not the super easy and there are ”
ENG1A
“she cares about how the students do in her class.”
ENG013

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and reading, and they do not clearly prove exam format or .

Essay-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clear
“ .”
ENG102
“there are ”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Even though her class is not the super easy and there are amount of time to do them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“I find that she is a great teacher.”

⚖️

70/100

“ .”

📝 Workload

35/100

“She gave a lot of every Thursdays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I like the way she was with her students, really respectful.
  • she cares about how the students do in her class.
  • I loved working with her.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • .
  • there are
  • Read All People's History of the United States for the whole semester

Theme 3

📈 About Fairness

  • she helps & gives a lot of time and chances.
  • she gives you a fair amount of time to do them.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because , though their themes are fairly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1022 reviews
ENG0131 review
ENG1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values