AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katsushige Kajiwara

MATH3 · MTH1 · MATH65 · MTH55 · MATH1 · MTH20 · MATH2 · ALGALG · MATH20 · MATH120 · MATH55 · MTHMATH · MTH65 · CLASSSECT · MATHCALC · 74 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want to truly learn math and are willing to work steadily for your grade.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear explanationsHeavy homeworkFair but demandingHelpful in math labStrong test preparation
  • Students and willingness to help.
  • The class , and serious study time.
  • Grades are fair and often strong when students keep up, but lazy students struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic if , and , but it is not a low-effort A in harder courses.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but the content can be fast paced, detailed, and demanding, especially in higher-level classes.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

Reviews strongly advise showing up and staying engaged, but they do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students highly recommend him because , and help make difficult math learnable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students describe grading as fair, with and and practice materials.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tons of , and serious weekly study expectations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students describe him as , and unusually strong at explaining math in multiple ways.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear driven , and finals, with exams closely matching practice work.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

teacher whose workload strongly rewards consistent effort.

Main concern

The main concern is the large amount of homework and fast pace in harder math courses.

What students said

“Gives tons of hw, some very challenging but interesting”
MATH20
“He is defiantly not the teacher to take if wanted an easy A”
MATH2
“ in any math classes.”
MATH65

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally standard but student-friendly because , and closely prepare students.

Practice TestsTests Based On HomeworkExtra CreditFinal May Determine Grade

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say tests are based on homework and , but do not clearly prove open-book or .

Practice TestsTests Based On HomeworkExtra Credit
“ , and it's really similar to the test.”
MATH20
“Practice tests and hand outs help you Ace the tests!”
MATH1
“ and his lecures”
MATH55

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The so clearly;so resourceful and experienced.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ in any math classes.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Gives tons of hw, some very challenging but interesting”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He
  • .
  • He explained everything in depth with every detail

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is not lazy, and he doesn't expect you to be either.
  • if you work hard, it'll show in your grades.
  • This is not one of those easy a classes.

Theme 3

🧪

  • and he makes the
  • The study guides he give out are identical to the test.
  • and his lecures

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

74

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 in-person reviews are detailed, consistent, and , and fair effort-based outcomes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 548
4 out of 515
3 out of 511
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH213 reviews
MATH208 reviews
MATH557 reviews
MATH655 reviews
MATH13 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MTH203 reviews
MTH12 reviews
MTH552 reviews
ALGALG1 review
CLASSSECT1 review
MATH1201 review
MATH31 review
MATHCALC1 review
MTH651 review
MTHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values