AI Rate Professor

Speech

Patti Keeling

COMM1 · COMM001 · SPEEC101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a and are willing to practice and complete every speech requirement.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful coachSpeech-heavy workloadExtra credit availableClear expectationsOne hard midterm concern
  • Most students praise her as nice, helpful, and .
  • The class requires multiple speeches, so effort and .
  • One negative review reports and a hard midterm that felt disconnected from speeches.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with complete speeches and steady work, helped by , but it is not effortless.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Speech itself is repeatedly described as hard, but her guidance makes the course manageable.

, so the score reflects classroom speech practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but the speech format likely requires regular participation.

Only in-person comments exist and they .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

because she lays out expectations, offers , and rewards completed work.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload is moderate because students mention five speeches and detailed requirements.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews describe her as , and effective despite one strong complaint about confusion.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

42/100

Assessment appears speech-focused with and performance based than exam based.

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly describe a , and real practice.

Main concern

The main concern is that speeches can be demanding and one student found the .

What students said

“we had to do 5 speeches but she helps you through it completely and gives .”
COMM001
“hard to get an a if you dont do everything she requires in ur speeches”
COMM1
“ and does not apply to the speeches”
SPEEC101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly mention a , while .

Hard MidtermSpeech-Based ClassPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the format, proctoring, or book policy.

Hard Midterm
“ and does not apply to the speeches”
SPEEC101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“speech is hard but if you do all your work, you can get an A”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

78/100

“she is a wonderful teacher she teaches a lot.”

Grade Fairness

68/100

“if you do all your work, you can get an A”

Workload Reality

52/100

“we had to do 5 speeches but she helps you through it completely and gives .”

Theme 1

Teaching Support

  • and extra help for those who need it.
  • she helps you through it completely and gives .
  • .

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • Speech is hard period
  • hard to get an a if you dont do everything she requires in ur speeches
  • if you do all your work, you can get an A

Theme 3

Concerns

  • She was never on topic
  • and does not stay on topic.
  • and does not apply to the speeches

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

There are only 6 in-person reviews, but most contain useful detail and the overall pattern is fairly consistent.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMM14 reviews
COMM0011 review
SPEEC1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values