AI Rate Professor

English

Seth Harwood

ENG2041 · ENG10 · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG7 · ENG45 · ENGLISH1A · ENGENG1 · ENGLISH4 · ONEBENG · ENG101A · ENG4 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and can handle strict essay expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMixed TeachingHard Essay GradingDiscussion BasedLaid Back But NitpickyAttendance Matters
  • Students are sharply divided, with some finding him fun and helpful while .
  • because several reviews describe him as nitpicky or very hard.
  • The class can be manageable for active readers and discussion participants but poor for quiet students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students say the class is easy, but and point deductions make an A uncertain.

, and it is mixed across courses.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The reading and papers are not usually described as conceptually hard, but and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and being marked absent when late.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and personality, but avoided by students hurt by grading or classroom style.

and strongly divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several students say , and expects his exact method.

Format shift

Strict-grading evidence comes from in-person English reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload seems moderate, with reading, discussion, and a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He can be fun, enthusiastic, and discussion-focused, but many students describe him as .

Format shift

Teaching and is highly mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and class discussion rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, praising his energy and discussions while , and student treatment.

Main concern

and participation expectations can make the class risky.

What students said

“he is very nit-picky ”
ENG4
“Mr. Harwood is super easy and very fun.”
ENG4
“If you're .”
ENG2041

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention essays and one in-class essay, but do not clearly .

In-Class EssayEssaysReading Discussions

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one in-class essay, with no clear exam proctoring or open-book policy.

In-Class EssayEssaysReading Discussions
“There were 3 essays total including 1 in-class essay.”
ENG45
“his papers were a MAX of 2 to 3 pages long!”
ENG4
“A lot of group discussions”
ENG4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he is very nit-picky when it comes to essays, make sure you follow directions clearly down to the T.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Entertaining, helpful, and enthusiatic. .”

⚖️

28/100

“Grades VERY hard.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

48/100

“If you're .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This class was Great!!
  • seems like he doesnt really know what he is talkin about. .
  • He also goes a little off topic sometimes but that's what keeps the class interestin

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Grades VERY hard.
  • anyone should be able to get an easy B.

Theme 3

💬 About Participation

  • A lot of group discussions and his papers were a MAX of 2 to 3 pages long!
  • Be interested and participate, otherwise you'll bore him.
  • he will call on random people to answer questions referencing the material

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen in-person reviews over several years provide enough detail, though opinions are strongly split by student fit.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews
ENG42 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENG101 review
ENG101A1 review
Show 7 more courses
ENG20411 review
ENG451 review
ENG71 review
ENGENG11 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH41 review
ONEBENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values