AI Rate Professor

Design

Barbara Dehar

INTD70 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this class if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear DirectionsPoor Learning ExperienceMiserable ClassNot Recommended
  • The and poor learning value.
  • The student strongly .
  • Evidence is very limited because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

No grade details are given, but the very high difficulty rating and negative experience suggest a hard path to success.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels challenging mainly because directions and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The student directly because the experience was miserable.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

, but the highest difficulty rating suggests little perceived leniency.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is not described directly, but the class is rated extremely difficult and poorly structured.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The review says the professor was unclear and created a poor learning experience.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not identify whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and a miserable overall experience.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“ and not a .”
INTD70
“ ”
INTD70

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and not a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“ and not a .”

👍 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ if you don not want to have a miserable experience!!!”

⚠️ Student Experience

10/100

“one of the worse classes that I have ever took!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and not a .
  • one of the worse classes that I have ever took!!!

Theme 2

🚫 About Recommendation

  • miserable experience!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the signal is severe but weakly supported.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

INTD701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values