AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Maurice Ngo

MATH37GEOTRI · MATH40 · MATH8CS20 · MATH37 · MATH65 · MATH4 · MATH1 · PRECAL · MATH2 · MATH55 · MATHTRIG · MTH2 · MTH65 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

A strong choice for students who want to learn math and are willing to keep up with homework and class pace.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplanationsFair TestsFunny LecturerHomework MattersFast Pace
  • Most students describe him as , and strong at making math understandable.
  • Grades are attainable if , and keep up with the pace.
  • The main drawbacks are fast lectures, occasional rudeness in office hours, and limited flexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Students can earn and paying attention, but the course is not a free A in harder math classes.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Ngo makes math understandable, but calculus, trig, fast pacing, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

because lectures and homework preparation directly support test performance.

and class participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him because , and effective for learning math.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students repeatedly call tests fair and , but not automatic generosity.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and sometimes heavy, but students generally describe it as manageable and useful for exams.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

, and ability to make difficult math understandable.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Assessment appears test-heavy but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, , and the need to keep up with homework.

Main concern

Students who fall behind may struggle because the pace can be fast and .

What students said

“ .No surprises. .”
MATH2
“Lots of .”
MATH37
“pay atttention in class and do the hw and you'll get an A”
MATH4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally described as fair and tied to homework, but reviews .

Fair TestsSimilar To HomeworkRegular TestsMultiple Choice Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe fair tests, frequent tests in some courses, and one multiple-choice style, but .

Fair TestsSimilar To HomeworkRegular TestsMultiple Choice Mentioned
“ .No surprises.”
MATH2
“ ”
MATH55
“Testing style is horrid...all multiple choice with no copy of .”
MATH65

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .No surprises. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and pace. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ , and he gets you to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

72/100

“pay atttention in class and do the hw and you'll get an A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of the .
  • .
  • He is able to be humorous and teach at the same time.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .No surprises.
  • but if and pay attention to the lectures you'll be fine.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Pace & Help

  • He goes fast!!! Alot of hw!
  • Can't ask questions without him getting irritable and dismissive bordering on argumentative.
  • sometimes it's difficult to get the help you need, but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five detailed in-person reviews across several years show mostly consistent praise with .

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH375 reviews
MATH655 reviews
MATH43 reviews
MATH12 reviews
MATH552 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH21 review
MATH37GEOTRI1 review
MATH401 review
MATH8CS201 review
MATHTRIG1 review
MTH21 review
MTH651 review
PRECAL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values