AI Rate Professor

English

Susan Gill

ENG101B · ENG107 · ENG1A · ENGL107 · ENGL102 · ENGL101B · ENG102 · ENGB101 · ENG101 · ENG101A · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and can handle writing practice, group work, and steady effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful and caringPassionate teacherImproves writingGroup work heavySometimes hard grader
  • Most students describe her as caring, helpful, and passionate about teaching writing.
  • The course can , and projects.
  • Grades feel fair to many students, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

An A is realistic with listening, following directions, and using her help, but some and lots of work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

and support make English more manageable, though the writing and group work still require effort.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

The in-person reviews discuss class interaction but do not clearly state an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and effective at improving writing.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Students describe her as fair and helpful, but several explicitly say she is a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload ranges from manageable homework that work, and projects.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most reviews praise her as helpful, passionate, patient, and strong at guiding students through writing.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments focus , and writing improvement rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly praise her support and teaching, while , and .

Main concern

Some students find the workload heavy and the .

What students said

“She gives you various opportunities to improve your writing and is willing to help you succeed.”
ENG102
“she is a and does not cut slack”
ENGL101B
“LOTS OF WORK, MUST DO ALL.”
568763

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignments but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives you various opportunities to improve your writing and is willing to help you succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is the .”

⚖️

56/100

“However, she is a and does not cut slack, at least not for me.”

📚 Workload

48/100

“A lot of work involved, but you will definitely walk away having learned something.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and teaches with so much passion.
  • She came to every class in a good mood and a big smile on.
  • She is great. very helpful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • if you listen, and follow direction, you will be fine.
  • she is a and does not cut slack
  • easy easy easy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of group work and projects.
  • A lot of work involved, but you will definitely walk away having learned something.
  • LOTS OF WORK, MUST DO ALL.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews over several years give consistent teaching themes, but the evidence is old and lacks current policy details.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG101A3 reviews
ENG1072 reviews
ENGL101B2 reviews
5687631 review
ENG1011 review
Show 6 more courses
ENG101B1 review
ENG1021 review
ENG1A1 review
ENGB1011 review
ENGL1021 review
ENGL1071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values