AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Seymour Singer

MATHAC65 · MATH · MATH37 · MATH65 · MATH32 · MATH33 · MATH31 · MTH65 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and , and risky exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesDisorganized teachingHeavy homeworkPoor test alignmentAvoid strongly
  • Most students strongly warn against taking him because , and disorganized.
  • Many comments say tests do not match lectures or notes, making grades feel unpredictable.
  • A few students say studying ahead helps, but the dominant experience is frustration and dropping the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A appears difficult because students report , and frequent drops despite some curving.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content becomes harder because , and often disconnected from exams.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as not mandatory, but attendance and staying current seem important for survival.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students explicitly warn others away because , and disorganized.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Some tests may be curved, but , and poor alignment with lectures.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention , and repeated test preparation struggles.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments describe his teaching as , and poorly connected to exams.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize chapter tests, quizzes, and exams as the submission.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, centered on confusing , and exams that feel disconnected from class.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say they were confused, had to drop, or could not rely on lectures to prepare for tests.

What students said

“ !!”
MATH31
“ notes, nor the book”
MATH65
“I HAD TO DROP HIS CLASS BECAUSE I WAS NOT LEARNING .”
MATH37

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not prove proctoring or open-book policy, but , and weak alignment with lectures.

Chapter TestsConfusing ExamsStrict MakeupsCurved Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe chapter tests and notes, but they do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Chapter TestsConfusing ExamsStrict MakeupsCurved Tests
“ notes, nor the book”
MATH65
“Very strict and always changing things around.”
MATH65
“ pass his tests”
MATH33

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I HAD TO DROP HIS CLASS BECAUSE I WAS NOT LEARNING .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“He doesn't know how to teach.”

🚫 Recommendation Level

12/100

“DO NOT TAKE HIS CLASS...I REPEAT... ...”

⚖️

22/100

“ notes, nor the book”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He rambles and repeats himself
  • and he talks to you like your a child.
  • His lectures are horrible and he can never clearly provide you with an example you can use.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to turn in hw every single day.
  • The last 3 quizs the class avg was 15 of 100.
  • pass his tests
  • because I was so .

Theme 3

🚫 About Warnings

  • .
  • .
  • !!! im dead serious!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent negative pattern with detailed examples.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH656 reviews
MATH313 reviews
MATH373 reviews
MATH2 reviews
MATH332 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH321 review
MATHAC651 review
MTH651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values