AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Marc Hsu

SOC1 · SOCI001 · SOC001 · SOCSOC1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Consider Hsu only if you can handle disorganization and rely heavily on lectures rather than structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedLecture-based testsEngaging lecturesClear at timesUnreliable grading
  • Reviews are split between students who learned a lot and .
  • Tests are described as lecture-based and sometimes easy, but one student reports a .
  • The biggest risk is poor organization and not following the syllabus.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

, but a reported unexplained failure prevents calling it an easy A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content seems approachable and lecture-based, though disorganization can make it harder to follow.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends on whether you value engaging sociology content enough to tolerate disorganization and .

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One student says he promised no grades below C- but .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

75/100

Reviews emphasize lecture-based tests and .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students praise his knowledge and lectures, but repeated disorganization weakens the overall teaching experience.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The clearest assessment evidence says tests are based solely on lectures.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but frequent disorganization and inconsistent class management.

Main concern

He may not follow the syllabus or .

What students said

“Mr. .”
SOC001
“ ”
SOCI001
“you can definetly learn alot by taking his Sociology class”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but as lecture-based and sometimes supported by provided answers.

Lecture-Based TestsAnswers Sometimes Provided

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Lecture-Based TestsAnswers Sometimes Provided
“ ”
SOCI001
“some of which he provided the answers to”
SOCI001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in organization, lectures, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“He never followed the syllabus.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Lectures are engaging.”

📈 Assessment Style

80/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Lectures are engaging.
  • and helpfull to his students.

Theme 2

📋

  • He never followed the syllabus.
  • I was never given a straight answer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five older in-person reviews provide consistent detail on disorganization but mixed opinions on teaching quality.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC12 reviews
SOC0011 review
SOCI0011 review
SOCSOC11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values