AI Rate Professor

English

Cindy Hicks

ENG101B · ENGLISH101A · ENGLISH1A · ENGL101B · ENGLISH101B · ENGLISH · ENG101A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you are already a strong and shifting essay expectations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear AssignmentsChanging ExpectationsEssay HeavyNice But ScatteredFast Pace
  • Students often .
  • The class is essay-centered and can punish students despite completed work.
  • A few students found her nice or passable, but most detailed reviews are negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Passing may be possible by doing essays, but and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content is not described as intellectually extreme, but and fast pacing raise the practical difficulty.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one review notes she was sometimes late.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most detailed reviews discourage taking her because and .

, and the recommendation tone is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students report essays being marked wrong despite effort and a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

as fair or essay-focused rather than overwhelming, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

She is sometimes described as nice, but repeated comments say , and not very helpful for learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears dominated by essays and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a mostly essay-based class with , and limited learning value.

Main concern

The main risk is unclear or .

What students said

“she says she expects one thing and then when .”
ENG101B
“Shes not very clear on what she asks of you for writing.”
ENGL101B
“She teaches fairly good but is not too clear on what she wants in the .”
ENGLISH101B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a final essay affecting the grade, but .

Final EssayNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or book policy.

Final Essay
“if no credit even if you had all the .”
ENGL101B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes not very clear on what she asks of you for writing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in , and essays. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“i dont think i learned anything in her class.”

⚖️

34/100

“last minute she changed her mind and decided to make the ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“Waist of time. Stay away”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is a nice teacher. though she is a little scatter brained.
  • She a good teacher but she move really fast
  • She teaches fairly good but is not too clear on what she wants in the .

Theme 2

📝 About Essays

  • .
  • the and unclear!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • ...
  • if you are an exelent writer then i would sujest mrs. hicks if not i would pick a different teacher.
  • Stay away

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

, but several are old or contain no comments.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL101B3 reviews
ENGLISH101B2 reviews
ENG101A1 review
ENG101B1 review
ENGLISH1 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH101A1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values