AI Rate Professor

English

Kate Swobada

ENG101B · ENGLISH101A · ENG101A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and inconsistent student experiences.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict writing standardsMixed teaching reviewsEssay heavyAttendance strictnessPossible favoritism
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with two very positive comments and two strongly negative ones.
  • Students describe strict writing expectations, especially grammar and essay structure.
  • Negative reviews cite favoritism, hard work without reward, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A appears possible, but students emphasize strict grammar, essay structure, and hard .

All evidence comes from four in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is basic English composition, but and grammar expectations make it feel harder.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One positive review says she is strict on tardies and coming late to class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Some students praise her as nice and knowledgeable, while others strongly complain about favoritism, strict rules, and poor outcomes.

All and is highly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students describe strict grammar and ending in no credit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The course appears essay-heavy, and one student describes doing many essays and assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and fun versus favoritism and serious dissatisfaction.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict strongly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews focus on essays, grammar, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

strict standards and very mixed student satisfaction.

Main concern

and classroom rules are strict or inconsistent.

What students said

“MAKES SURE UR GRAMMAR IS PREFECT TO GET 90%.”
ENG101A
“HORRIBLE...PLAYS FAVORTISIM..”
ENG101B
“ ”
ENGLISH101A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy
“ so easy”
ENG101A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very nice, she knows what she is teaching, she is strict on tardies and coming late to class, but other than that so easy..she loves to teach and she is very fun..so ..i guarntee u won't be dissapoitined”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting mixed teaching reactions, strict writing standards, and workload concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ ”

⚖️

30/100

“MAKES SURE UR GRAMMAR IS PREFECT TO GET 90%.”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“HORRIBLE...PLAYS FAVORTISIM..”

Theme 1

✍️ About Essays And Grades

  • ... FACT, FACT, PROOF.
  • MAKES SURE UR GRAMMAR IS PREFECT TO GET 90%.
  • so easy

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she loves to teach and she is very fun
  • HORRIBLE...PLAYS FAVORTISIM..

Theme 3

📌 About Rules And Effort

  • she is strict on tardies and coming late to class
  • if U DO A AND YOU ALL DONT TRUN IT IN AT ONCE RIGHT AFTER SHE WONT ACCEPT IT!
  • the whole tyme i was working hard in her class doing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are four reviews with specific details, but they are old and strongly inconsistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG101A2 reviews
ENG101B1 review
ENGLISH101A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values