AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Lindsey Drennon

Courses not reported · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if possible, but be cautious online because grading and communication appear inconsistent.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear instructionsTough graderLots of homeworkGroup projectsUneven responsiveness
  • Online reviews are mixed, with one student praising clarity and another reporting unfair deductions and poor response to messages.
  • In-person evidence is very positive, emphasizing easy exams, , participation, and group projects.
  • Grades can be high, but online students should expect , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

High grades are possible, but online students report tough grading and lots of homework while the and .

Online reviews suggest effort and , while the single in-person review suggests an easier A with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The material is described as clear and understandable, though reading load and .

Online comments emphasize long textbook chapters and assignments, while the if students pay attention.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters in the in-person class, but reviews .

Only the in-person review mentions participation, and online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format because in-person feedback is strong but and communication complaints.

Online recommendation evidence is divided, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grading appears split between tough and disputed .

Format shift

Online reviews lean strict, while the .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Online reviews mention long chapters, lots of homework, and the need to carefully check every assignment.

Format shift

Heavy workload evidence comes from online reviews, while the .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Drennon can be clear and organized, but online communication and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

36/100

Online reviews center on assignments, rubrics, homework, and feedback, while the and group projects.

Format shift

Online assessment appears assignment-heavy, while , and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single in-person review is very positive, , and group projects.

Main concern

Participation and .

What students said

“ if you pay attention”
21264
“She grades easy”
21264
“gives options”
21264

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students report clear structure and , but , and unresolved grading disputes in another.

Main concern

, and communication can be unreliable when problems arise.

What students said

“ ”
22457
“ though, you need .”
22457
“Ignored several of my messages asking to reevaluate my work.”
22457

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Only the easy if students pay attention, while online exam policy is not proven.

Easy Exams If Paying AttentionReviews do not clearly prove online exam format

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The if students pay attention, but does not prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Easy Exams If Paying Attention
“ if you pay attention”
21264

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book status, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam format

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ though, you need .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ ”

⚖️

50/100

“ up exactly with what the rubric says.”

📚 Workload

32/100

“Textbook chapters are quite long”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor was responsive and provided .
  • Ignored several of my messages asking to reevaluate my work.
  • brings guest speaker and gives options.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • though, you need .
  • She grades easy
  • Total grade locked.

Theme 3

🧩 About Coursework

  • Lots of homework
  • , and participation
  • Textbook chapters are quite long but easy to understand and fun to read.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

The three recent reviews include specific details, but the small sample and strong format split limit certainty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

224572 reviews
212641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1