AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

M Little

CISC305ONLINE · CISC300 · CISW320 · CISW327 · CISA305 · CISC310 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless and carefully parse long, scattered Canvas instructions.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsVerbose ModulesStrict Drop PolicySelf-Directed WorkSlow Response
  • Recent online reviews slam convoluted multi-tab modules and .
  • Course content can be easy, but navigating directions and deadlines creates the real struggle.
  • state a preference.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Content is often easy enough for As, but and .

Online recent reviews get As despite misery; if you follow the syllabus.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Material itself is not advanced CIS theory, but fluffed modules and long instructions make it feel harder than it is.

Both formats describe easy projects once instructions are decoded; online noise is worse.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and participation tags make attendance-style compliance effectively required.

Online has explicit 7-8 day drop rule; but note D2L submission expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and recent comments urge complaints to the department chair.

; a few old in-person reviews still recommend CIS 300.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some offer revisions and easy content grading, but and .

Format shift

; older sections sound fairer with office-hour help.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Weekly projects, dense modules, reading, and participation create more busywork than the unit count suggests.

Format shift

Online students emphasize 5-page instructions and constant submissions; hybrid also felt heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Recent students find modules scattered and unhelpful, with slow email response and defensive curriculum attitude.

Format shift

with modern online frustration.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Chapter projects, quizzes, participation, and a .

Format shift

; hybrid used D2L quiz and in-class build exam.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Older hybrid and in-person comments are more mixed .

Main concern

units and tricky quizzes.

What students said

“ .”
CISW320
“she is a good with computers”
CISC300
“the struggle to decipher her instructions and her work load that left me working harder than all my other classes”
CISC305ONLINE

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CIS courses feature verbose COVID-era modules, book projects, participation, and .

Main concern

and a fail-the-course final policy make an otherwise simple content load feel brutal.

What students said

“Very convoluted modules, which are multiple tabs, extremely verbose, and non-descriptive.”
CISW327
“If you don't submit any assignments within 7-8 days, you'll be dropped.”
CISC300
“ because if you do not pass the if you ended up getting a passing grade.”
CISW327

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is not openly student-friendly because a and quizzes can reference later material.

High-stakes final can fail courseChapter quizzesIn-class website build examBook-based projects

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Hybrid had chapter quizzes plus an in-class D2L quiz and ; .

Chapter quizzesIn-class build examD2L quiz
“The and an in-class "build this website" exam.”
CISW320

Online

Online finals can fail the whole course even with a passing average; quizzes sometimes pull later-chapter concepts.

Fail-the-course finalConfusing quiz itemsBook projects
“if you do not pass the if you ended up getting a passing grade.”
CISW327
“Writes her own quiz questions that sometimes make no sense or reference material in later readings”
CISC310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very convoluted modules, which are multiple tabs, extremely verbose, and non-descriptive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 , and recommendation failure. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Recommendation Collapse

12/100

“"Little" want to ever do this again.”

🧭 Instruction Chaos

30/100

“The hardest part of her class is deciphering her 5 page long instructions for the weekly project.”

⏱️

35/100

“If you don't submit any assignments within 7-8 days, you'll be dropped.”

📚 Content vs Delivery

54/100

“The course content itself was incredibly easy, but some of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Any technical difficulties? Oh good! Get ready to have the directions repeated over and .
  • .
  • she is a great teacher but because she has a lot of classes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • to understand
  • Thinks very highly of her curriculum and has a 'can do no wrong' attitude if questioned.

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Design

  • File your complaints with the department chair, Bryan Krofchok.
  • There is no joy in this class except the webpage coding.
  • and did not .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only fourteen reviews with a , though recent online complaints are consistent.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CISC3003 reviews
CISC3103 reviews
CISW3203 reviews
CISC305ONLINE2 reviews
CISW3272 reviews
Show 1 more courses
CISA3051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values