AI Rate Professor

Nursing

John Vertido

VN140 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid if you can; students describe a hostile, unfair clinical instructor and urge others to run.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBullying and favoritismInconsistent harsh gradingEmbarrasses students clinicallyHeavy papers and care plansHostile clinical environment
  • Students repeatedly describe bullying, yelling, and public embarrassment at clinical sites
  • , and inconsistent even when many still earn A or A+
  • Heavy documentation load and tense climate make the class stressful despite strong grades

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many still finish with A or A+, but and high stress rather than a free A.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Students describe high difficulty, heavy lectures, lots of papers, and a tense clinical environment.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

clinical nursing setting.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and and the program.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students call him a and student.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews cite lots of homework, so , and weekly quizzes.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students say he is knowledgeable but rude, forgetful, vague, and creates an unsafe learning climate.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Heavy emphasis on care plans, papers, documentation, quizzes, and clinical notes over a .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and lecture experience marked by intimidation, favoritism, and heavy paperwork.

Main concern

Hostile treatment, public shaming at clinical, and .

What students said

“He bullies students, plays favorites, and grades unfairly.”
VN140
“He yells at students and makes them feel small.”
VN140
“Run!”
VN140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment load is heavy and high-pressure with papers, care plans, and quizzes rather than student-friendly testing.

Care plansQuizzesLecture heavySo many papers

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and clinical documentation; they do not clearly prove open-book or software proctoring.

Care plansQuizzesSo many papersLecture heavy
“4 assigned patients, 4 nursing care plans, 4 pathophysiology, 8 nursing notes of head to toe assessments.”
VN140
“ .”
VN140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible professor. Bullies students. Borderline sexually harasses. ... Run!”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 , and clinical risk. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Hostile Climate

8/100

“He yells at students and makes them feel small.”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is knowledgeable but not a good teacher.
  • Constant repeating, forgetfulness, misunderstandings and very vague instructions.
  • Never had a professor who goes in round abouts with lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • So many papers

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clinical Conduct

  • He picks on students&will embarrass them at clinical sites in front of the clinical staff.
  • Yells at students at clinical in front of staff.
  • Puts you down, makes students cry.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven consistently negative in-person reviews from 2022-2025 provide detailed, highly aligned accounts of teaching climate and grading.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

VN14011 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values