AI Rate Professor

English

Camille Waggoner

ENGL303 · ENGWR101 · ENGWR51 · ENGWR480 · ENGWR100 · ENGL300 · ENG301 · ENG300 · ENGWR301 · ENWR51 · ENGWR49 · ENGWR50 · ENGWR303 · ENG100 · ENGLT321 · 80 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
73.91%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you can handle essays and reading; online with is usually friendlier .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEXTRA CREDITSo many papersClear grading criteriaTough graderGet ready to read
  • and several papers or in-class essays
  • Online sections often feel much easier due to heavy and discussion posts
  • caring and others

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Online can make an A easy, but and can be tough if grammar or structure is weak.

Online reviews skew Easy A; and sometimes tough.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Average difficulty is low-to-moderate; the and .

Online is easier; but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, while others report optional or unenforced attendance.

Online often optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Roughly three-quarters would take again, with strong support and .

Online recommendation is stronger; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and clear criteria help many students, but and grammar error counts frustrate others.

Format shift

Online grading feels generous; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect ; not endless busywork but paper volume matters.

Format shift

Online workload is lighter; in-person summer/hybrid and writing courses can pile up papers.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

, and passionate about literature; others find lectures boring, slow, or unorganized.

Format shift

Online praise centers on support and EC; in-person quality is more split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and occasional in-class timed essays.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-driven; online adds discussion boards and optional Zoom.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and essay clarity versus complaints about boring lectures, tough grammar grading, and paper load.

Main concern

writers or ESL students, and lectures often feel long or dull.

What students said

“She gives so many opportunities. The work really isn't that hard at all.”
ENGL303
“She made me feel as if no matter what I did, she'd fail me.”
ENGWR301
“As long as you fix what she tells you to fix in .”
ENGWR101

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students repeatedly call the class a breeze with , and huge .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Super easy class! She gives an insane amount of .”
ENGWR301
“Work load was very and discussion boards.”
ENGWR301
“Class was truly a breeze, especially with everything going on right now. She offered 100+ points of for simple things.”
ENGL303

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays rather than proctored software exams; some finals or midterms are in-class timed essays.

In-class essaysTake-home essaysDiscussion postsExtra creditPeer reviews

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews commonly mention multiple take-home essays plus in-class midterm or .

In-class essaysTake-home essaysPeer reviewsSo many papers
“The the toughest part of her class but still not bad.”
ENG300
“4 essays ranging from 3-5 pages. 1 of those 4 was an ”
ENG301

Online

Online reviews emphasize , and large rather than lockdown-style exams.

Discussion postsEssaysExtra creditOptional Zoom
“There are 3 essays, but she never graded the 3rd. Each week there is at least 1 discussion post”
ENGWR301
“ .”
ENGWR301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives so many opportunities. The work really isn't that hard at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (6 online, 44 in-person), highlighting essays, , and mixed lecture quality. Credibility rating: High.

📝

58/100

“Your grade in this class is very dependant on 4 essays.”

🎁 Advantage

85/100

“Gives TONS of EC- like over 50 points.”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“I highly recommend to take for either ENGWR101 or ENGWR51.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Her lectures are super long and boring
  • She teaches well and students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard to get below 100%
  • she does grade hard
  • If you get over 10 errors on the .

Theme 3

📚

  • So many papers
  • and reading.
  • Really easy class and 3) and 2 in class essays.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

80

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years and both formats give strong sample size, though ones.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 538
4 out of 58
3 out of 513
2 out of 515
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGWR5111 reviews
ENGWR1018 reviews
ENGWR3017 reviews
ENG3004 reviews
ENG3013 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ENGWR3033 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENGL3032 reviews
ENGWR1002 reviews
ENGWR492 reviews
ENGWR502 reviews
ENGL3001 review
ENGLT3211 review
ENGWR4801 review
ENWR511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 5 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1