AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Nicholas Miller

FCS320 · SOC321 · SOC1764 · SOC301 · SOC3 · COMM301 · SOC310 · CSP305 · SOC300 · 85 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
68.42%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want engaging sociology and can handle picky writing standards and regular reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate sociologistWriting-heavyTough essay graderFunny and caringLots of reading and videos
  • Students praise passion, humor, and feedback but and writing strictly.
  • , and exams rather than free easy credit.
  • if you write well and put , and discussions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is reachable with consistent posts, reading, and solid writing, but As.

Online often easy if work is done; in person mixed with and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

but volume of reading, videos, and .

Some online sections feel heavier on writing and videos; in person difficulty varies by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Many sections mark attendance mandatory or warn that missing class and .

Online focuses on discussion deadlines; in .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and teaching energy if you accept strict writing standards.

Both formats recommend when students like sociology; and load.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

, and tests that demand cited readings.

Format shift

Online and in person both report picky grading; some older SOC300 reviews felt easier.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Lots of , and quizzes across formats.

Format shift

Online video and post load is high; in person adds binders, projects, and essays.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

; lectures and discussions keep many students engaged.

Format shift

Strong praise in both formats; .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Discussion posts, journals, quizzes, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

Online leans discussions and unit quizzes; in person mixes papers, binders, and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Engaging , and harder tests for some; attendance and effort matter.

Main concern

and activity binders; workload can spike.

What students said

“Professor Miller is a wonder teacher, but by far the so far.”
SOC301
“his lectures were never boring which helped a lot.”
SOC300
“Easy A if you show up!”
SOC300

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

; and often doable if you stay on schedule; some call it writing-heavy or video-heavy.

Main concern

and writing with and exams.

What students said

“Lots of reading and video watching as one can expect from an online class.”
SOC301
“If you don't pass this class, it's your fault.”
SOC301
“it did feel more like an english writing class than a sociology class. So much writing..”
SOC301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard mix of quizzes and exams; some non-multiple-choice tests and study guides reported.

Midterm and finalStudy guidesDiscussion boardsQuizzesEssay-heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and projects; cite readings on tests.

Weekly quizzesStudy guidesNote cards sometimesEssay components
“ as long as and read the book!!”
SOC300
“He does not accept your opinions as .”
SOC321

Online

and final; some say quizzes are hard but untimed or guide-supported.

Unit quizzesDiscussion postsMidterm and finalStudy guide
“Midterm and the study guide but it is very extensive.”
SOC301
“The , but there is no time limit on it”
SOC301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nich is awesome! ... He cares and is extremely passionate about his work and it shows. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (16 online, 34 in person), highlighting passion, writing-heavy assessment, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“If you want a funny professor who knows how to educate with jokes. PROF NICH IS THE ONE FOR YOU.”

⚖️

38/100

“by far the so far. If essay writing is not your strong .”

📚 Workload

36/100

“The class was very interesting but had a lot of reading and videos to watch.”

👍 Recommendation

68/100

“ , if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were never boring which helped a lot.
  • He's super simple
  • and genuinely cares about his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • As long as you do the work every other week before midnight you will receive an A.
  • . and reading

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Load

  • So much writing..
  • 2 papers which aren't too hard as long as you don't procrastinate
  • I struggled a little bit in his class just because of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

85

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with , and teaching give a reliable blended picture.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 514
3 out of 59
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

SOC30118 reviews
SOC30017 reviews
SOC3103 reviews
SOC3213 reviews
FCS3202 reviews
Show 6 more courses
SOC32 reviews
3001 review
3011 review
COMM3011 review
CSP3051 review
SOC17641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 4 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1