AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Sarah Mora

ENGR422 · ENGR400 · ENGR300 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a and rewards real effort, not a free ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesStudent Success FocusedContent HeavyOptional HomeworkEngineering Mentor
  • Students unanimously would take her again for , and real care for success.
  • Engineering content and exams can be tough, but , office hours, and .
  • Homework is because quizzes and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic with and attention, but and exams are genuinely hard.

; in person mixes tough statics exams with more forgiving grading comments.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Material is content-heavy engineering work that clicks with good lectures but is not lightweight.

Both formats call content challenging; online AutoCAD is more skill-practice, in person statics is tougher conceptually.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

92/100

as not mandatory.

Evidence is consistent across the two online and five in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

All seven reviewers would take her again and .

Recommendation is unanimous in both formats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One online student calls her a , while several in-person students find her forgiving if you engage.

Format shift

Online ; in person reports more second-chance friendliness.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and content load, though HW is often optional and or videos help.

Format shift

Online has involved assignments; in person stresses optional but .

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

, and visible investment in student success.

Format shift

Online shines via recorded AutoCAD lectures; in person via board organization and office hours.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and quizzes drive grades while .

Format shift

In , and quizzes; online still centers graded work and involved assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person statics and ENGR400 students praise lecture clarity, board notes, forgiving growth, and tough but .

Main concern

Content-heavy courses with and if you want top grades.

What students said

“ and there's a good amount of homework, but she actually gives you the so it's manageable”
ENGR422
“Her lecture notes make understanding the concepts a whole lot easier.”
ENGR400
“ and .”
ENGR422

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online AutoCAD and ; assignments can be involved but followable with time.

Main concern

for small misses.

What students said

“She recorded all and easy to follow videos that make learning AutoCad so much easier.”
ENGR400
“Should follow the things!”
ENGR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often hard and content-aligned, with and making study manageable.

Hard ExamsAnswer Keys ProvidedQuiz From HomeworkThree Tests Plus Final

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but supported by , lecture notes, and homework-linked quizzes.

Hard ExamsAnswer KeysQuizzes Based on HW
“ and there's a good amount of homework, but she actually gives you the ”
ENGR422
“3 test and a final, and 3 quizzes. so do the assigned HW!”
ENGR400

Online

Online reviews focus more on graded .

Rubric-Based Grading
“Her homeworks are easy but a bit of writing. Should follow the things!”
ENGR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and is relatable... and there's a good amount of homework, but she actually gives you the so it's manageable if you put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews across online and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Professor Mora is great at explaining challenging concepts. She ensures every student gets their questions answered thoroughly.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“100% recommend her.”

📚 Workload Reality

52/100

“This course is very content heavy, and for her first time teaching it, she did amazing.”

⚖️

55/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lecture notes make understanding the concepts a whole lot easier.
  • clear and easy to follow videos
  • organization on the board and in her notes makes each problem easy to walk through

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her
  • Should follow the
  • and not graded, but

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • professor mora really cares about her students and it shows
  • She wants her students to succeed
  • Office hours are very beneficial

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only seven recent reviews, but they are detailed and highly consistent on teaching quality and recommendation.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR4004 reviews
ENGR4222 reviews
ENGR3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values