AI Rate Professor

English

Matt Tittle

ENGWR101 · ENGWR302 · ENG300 · ENGWR301 · ENGLISH100 · ENG101 · ENGWR303 · ENGWR300 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
78.13%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Worth it if you follow every instruction and ; recent .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilariousExtra creditClear grading criteriaTough on AIEssay-focused
  • Most students find , and if you follow directions.
  • many Easy A stories, but recent online reviews slam harsh AI detection and .
  • Workload is steady weekly journals or 2-3 assignments plus .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Many Easy A and extra-credit comments exist, but and AI-zero reports mean an A is not automatic.

; recent online is more risk due to AI policing.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Writing load is manageable for most, with , though weekly work and .

Both formats describe doable content if instructions are followed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Some sections require attendance before drop date or mark it mandatory; many say he is not a stickler.

; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Strong historical love for humor and , tempered by recent AI-accusation and .

In-person reputation is warmer; online recent reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and clear criteria help many students, but tough AI zeros and .

Format shift

Online AI policies drive the strict side of grading.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Typically a few essays plus weekly journals or 2-3 assignments; not overwhelming if consistent.

Format shift

Some online and advanced sections report heavier reading and papers.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Long record of funny, personable lectures and and .

Format shift

; online quality is mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Essays, journals, discussions, and exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper- and discussion-driven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, chill, and easy if you do the work and , with occasional complaints about tangents or busywork.

Main concern

Tangents and busywork can annoy, and a minority say lectures do not teach.

What students said

“ !!!”
ENGWR300
“He's super chill and he's not a ”
ENGWR301
“Lectures are useless, poor at explaining directions”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as easy to follow with weekly work and essays, but recent reviews warn of harsh AI zeroing and .

Main concern

AI detection can give automatic zeros even when students insist work is original.

What students said

“He would always check writing for AI and no matter how much it came back as he would give it a zero.”
ENGWR300
“I can't appreciate the .”
ENGWR300
“As long as you follow the instructions of every assignment and you complete all of the .”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and proctored exams.

Essay-basedFew timed quizzesExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and following format rules rather than closed-book finals.

EssaysJournalsExtra credit
“ , and 10 short journals over the entire semester.”
ENGWR300
“The whole semester is 2 in class essays, and 3 out of class essays”
ENG300

Online

Online work is essays and weekly Canvas tasks; risk is AI scanning, not webcam proctoring.

EssaysAI detectionCanvas assignments
“if there is any AI you get an automatic 0.”
ENGWR300
“We really only had like 4 quizzes that Had no time limit and were super easy.”
ENGWR301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing long-run humor and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“This man is everything a teacher should aspire to be.”

😂 Humor Factor

88/100

“He is hilarious and there is never a dull moment in his class.”

⚠️

35/100

“He accused me of cheating even though I didn't.”

🅰️ Effort for Grade

72/100

“You just gotta put some effort into the assignments and you'll get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's super chill and he's not a
  • Tittle is super funny and talks mostly in sarcasm.
  • He loves to talk.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A. Don't underrate your professor
  • Gives lots of .
  • , if not professor gives automatic F.

Theme 3

🖥️ About Online / AI

  • He would always check writing for AI and no matter how much it came back as he would give it a zero.
  • I can't appreciate the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews spanning many years with rich detail; recent AI-related complaints add important contrast to long positive history.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGWR30023 reviews
ENGWR3018 reviews
ENG3005 reviews
ENGWR1015 reviews
ENGWR3023 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG1012 reviews
ENGWR3032 reviews
1011 review
ENGLISH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 4 · A 19

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2