Linda Myers

ENGLISH101 · ENGWR101 · ENGWR51 · ENGWR302 · ENGRD300 · READING110 · ENG301 · ENG300 · ENGWR301 · ENGWR108 · ENGRD310 · ENGWR303 · ENG100 · ENGWR300 · 110 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 48/100
RMP rating: 3.5/5
Take again: 53.85%
Difficulty: 3.4

The decision

if you want rigorous academic writing coaching and can tolerate strict rules and uneven communication.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict attendance and phonesTough grader onlineStep-by-step research projectSlow feedback commonPolarizing classroom tone

and structured semester projects.
Recent online and some in-person , and rudeness.
Attendance and phone rules are strict; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible with full effort and revisions, but , and high writing volume.

In-person historical reviews more often report fair As; recent online reviews describe hard work without easy grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and scholarly writing expectations raise intellectual and time demand.

Both formats are writing-intensive; online adds confusion from changing instructions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple reviews , and phones can get you removed.

In-person attendance rules are explicit; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half would take again; older .

In person more mixed-positive historically; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and picky standards; some older reviews call her lenient with extensions.

Format shift

as harsher and slower than classic in-person sections.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and reading; some say one scaffolded project dominates the semester.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-heavy; online complaints emphasize six-part projects and discussion length.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Can teach academic writing well and offer office help, but many cite rudeness, unread emails, and disorganization.

Format shift

; online teaching experience is largely poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Scaffolded research project, essays, annotations, and quizzes dominate; .

Format shift

Recent online students stress AI-graded annotations and multi-part papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many credit her for improving writers via a , and unorganized.

Main concern

and personality clashes can overshadow the structured writing help.

What students said

“She really wants her students to pass and sets her students up for success.”
ENG300

“Personally however, she was very rude to the class.”
ENGWR300

“ . Don't even consider her.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and harsh AI enforcement.

Main concern

Disorganization, zero-tolerance partial credit, and .

What students said

“ . .”
engwr303

“Just horrible. Never responded to any of my emails even after multiple weeks.”
ENG301

“If you are looking for an easy A, .”
ENGWR302

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

High-stakes feel comes from papers more than traditional closed finals; some tests allow notes, but writing requirements are strict.

Open book or notes on some testsFew quizzesScaffolded research projectUnlimited quiz retakes in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person , and strict classroom rules; open book/notes mentioned recently.

Scaffolded semester paperStrict attendanceOpen book or notes sometimes

“She does extend due dates, allows .”
ENG300

“It consisted of primarily a semester research project which was separated into parts which made it very easy.”
ENGWR300

Online

Online comments focus on , and but limited answer review rather than proctored exams.

Multi-part research projectDelayed gradingQuiz retakes

“She will have you do a total of six parts of the .”
ENGWR300

“ , but didn't allow you to see which questions you got wrong.”
ENGWR108

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Need a EngWr class? . She is very unorganized, changes due dates mid week, and will give you a ZERO if you miss one part of an assignment.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing older in-person praise with newer online criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

48/100

“I enjoyed her class, and . She does extend due dates, allows .”

🚫

25/100

“ ”

📝 Writing Scaffolding

70/100

“ . She gives you everything you need.”

⚖️ Strict Classroom Rules

20/100

“After 3 absences you will be dropped, 3 lates is 1 absence.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She really wants her students to pass and sets her students up for success.
She would attack people for their religion and put us down for our ethics.
. I promise she sizzles down!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

If you are looking for an easy A, .
She grades very leniently.
Prepare to do detailed and scholarly writing.

Theme 3

📬

.
Straight up ignored my emails.
changes due dates, instructions, and lesson plans part-way into the school week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

110

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show a and newer online frustration, with enough detail to trust the pattern.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551

4 out of 512

3 out of 514

2 out of 513

1 out of 520

Course coverage

ENG30013 reviews

ENGWR30012 reviews

ENGWR1017 reviews

ENG3015 reviews

ENGWR3023 reviews

Show 9 more courses

ENGLISH1012 reviews

ENG1001 review

ENGRD3001 review

ENGRD3101 review

ENGWR1081 review

ENGWR3011 review

engwr3031 review

ENGWR511 review

READING1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 4 · A 13 · A- 3

B range

B+ 3 · B 5

C range

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 4 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 2

Linda Myers

x x x if you want rigorous academic writing coaching and can tolerate strict rules and uneven communication.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Mandatory

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Split

🚫 x x x

📝 Writing Scaffolding

⚖️ Strict Classroom Rules

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

📬 x x x x

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want rigorous academic writing coaching and can tolerate strict rules and uneven communication.

🚫

📬