AI Rate Professor

English

Danny Romero

ENGWR302 · ENGWR300 · ENG300 · ENGW302 · ENGWR301 · ENGC1000 · ENGWR410 · ENG101 · ENG304 · ENG · ENGCW400 · ENGWRT304 · CREATIVEWRITING · ENG100 · ENGCWR431 · 150 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
6.56%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh unclear gradingSlow useless feedbackEssay-only grade riskRambling lecturesAvoid if possible
  • and confusion complaints.
  • Students say small work is ignored while a .
  • ; many urge others to run.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even strong writers and students with outside and opaque standards.

Both online and ; grades cluster low or incomplete.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

, and little instructional clarity make the course feel needlessly hard.

Difficulty is high in both formats for different logistics but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, yet some online/creative writing comments say he did not care about attendance.

In person more often mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

and comments repeatedly say stay away or find another professor.

and in person, with only isolated positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Near-universal tough grader reports, all-or-nothing homework, and .

Format shift

Harshness is consistent across formats.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Frequent summaries plus multiple essays; small work often ungraded yet still required, while .

Format shift

Online students especially note 15-20 ungraded summaries plus few graded essays.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe rambling lectures, ignored emails, late materials, and demeaning or .

Format shift

A few in-person students call him wise if you chase help; the majority still rate teaching poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Despite many small assignments, final grade often hinges on a .

Format shift

Online and while other work may not count.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person is also mostly harsh and confusing, with rare fans who like the challenge if they seek constant help.

Main concern

, and grades that feel arbitrary.

What students said

“This teacher has such a not do good.”
ENG100
“HORRIBLE CLASS. He constantly rambles on about his political views in class and never actually teaches how to write.”
ENGWR302
“Prof. Romero decided to curse at and demean the student, bringing him to tears in front of the class.”
ENGWR410

Remote format

Online

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and unhelpful critiques.

Main concern

You will not know your standing for weeks and .

What students said

“If : lucky you!!! ... RUN!”
ENG100
“He fails you no matter how hard you try.”
ENGWR302
“He told me I was a horrible writer and a terrible student.”
ENG300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Risk is not proctoring software but and unhelpful critique.

Essay-heavy gradingUnclear rubricsSlow gradingPhoto annotationsLimited rewrites

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lectures ramble, three essays often decide the course, expectations stay ambiguous, occasional rewrite allowed.

Three essays commonAmbiguous expectationsHarsh essay grades
“You're only expected to write 3 essays. I've never received a D on a paper until this class.”
ENGWR302
“No one knew what he wanted from the assignments and gave most people D's on the papers.”
ENGWR302

Online

Online students report essays graded late with , and mandatory ungraded weekly writing.

Essays only effectively gradedIllegible photo feedbackLate grading
“He grades the 3 essays only but not the 15-20 other smaller summaries”
ENGW302
“he emails you blurry/dark pictures of annotations that are illegible.”
ENG300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If : lucky you!!! He's very unclear with his directions. You won't be graded for a month so you have no idea where you stand. ... RUN!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and avoid consensus. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He does not teach a single thing, but talks nonsense for the whole duration of the zoom meeting.”

🚫 Recommendation

10/100

“FIND ANOTHER PROFESSOR!”

⚖️

10/100

“For english help me write it and I still received a bad grade.”

🐢

12/100

“Constantly behind with been graded at the end of the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks forever and says nothing.
  • Zoom classes provide very little assistance in improving skills.
  • He constantly rambles on about his political views in class and never actually teaches how to write.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . If you do bad on them you fail
  • Try to fix everything he tells you to fix, you will get the same grade.
  • No matter

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • He yelled at a student for wanting more clarification.
  • Prof. Romero decided to curse at and demean the student, bringing him to tears in front of the class.
  • Tells you you will fail as a writer no matter what.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

150

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

50 highly consistent negative reviews across years and formats, with repeated specific failures in and feedback.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 513
3 out of 56
2 out of 535
1 out of 583

Course coverage

ENG30011 reviews
ENGWR3028 reviews
ENGWR3007 reviews
ENGW3025 reviews
ENGCW4004 reviews
Show 10 more courses
CREATIVEWRITING3 reviews
ENGWR3013 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENG1 review
ENG1011 review
ENG3041 review
ENGC10001 review
ENGCWR4311 review
ENGWR4101 review
ENGWRT3041 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

7

B 4 · B- 3

C range

8

C 7 · C- 1

D range

5

D+ 1 · D 4

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

21

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 5