AI Rate Professor

Math Statisitics

Tricia Sanford

MATH300 · MATH335 · MATH400 · STAT300 · MATH34 · MATH420 · MATH372 · MATH103 · MATH120 · MATH370 · MATH401 · MATH100 · STATS300 · MATH373 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
24.39%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if you can; only consider if you already excel in math and tolerate strict, high-volume classes.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHuge homework loadHarsh classroom toneTest-heavy mathUnclear lectures
  • Most recent reviews urge avoiding her for strict rules, harsh tone, and .
  • and exams often feel harder or mismatched to teaching.
  • A minority older or if you work hard and attend.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough grading, exam-heavy weight, and .

; and unpredictable partial credit.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Math and stats content plus fast lectures and .

Online and taught clearly.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and punctuality with strict consequences.

In person is stricter on presence; but still high engagement pressure.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Majority of , and grading.

A few online/in-person outliers liked her care, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and exam-dominated grades.

Format shift

Online students also report unfair or unpredictable scoring of work and explanations.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

, and constant practice that students call absurd.

Format shift

; online adds discussions and frequent quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common complaints of , and harsh classroom interactions outweigh older positives.

Format shift

Online lecture videos are especially criticized; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and quizzes dominate grades; but recovery is limited if .

Format shift

Online also heavily weights quizzes/exams and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews emphasize , and frequent frustration with teaching clarity.

Main concern

Rude or punitive interactions plus crushing workload and .

What students said

“ ”
MATH400
“publicly humiliates anyone a minute late or on their phone”
Math300
“This is by far the !”
STAT300

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online calculus/stats comments , and video or explanation requirements stressful.

Main concern

, and poor lecture videos.

What students said

“she is one of the .”
MATH401
“Go somewhere to take it, By taking this class you will be asked to take the .”
MATH400
“her lecture videos are horrible, and she makes a lot of mistakes”
MATH400

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

timed or harshly scored, with little safety net.

Test heavyTough gradingExams harder than homeworkPop quizzesVideo explanations online

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

homework, with strict point deductions.

Exam-heavy gradePop quizzesTests unlike homeworkHarsh partial credit
“the grades ”
Math300
“ .”
STATS300

Online

and may not match lectures; finals sometimes easier than midterms.

Video explain quizzes/examsTough unpredictable gradingTests differ from examples
“you will be asked to take the .”
MATH400
“The and it feels like she is trying to trick you.”
MATH400

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please do not take this professor, despite me passing she assigned so .”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 math/ , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“she is one of the .”

📚 Workload

15/100

“she assigned so .”

⚖️ Grading

18/100

“she is the toughest and .”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • didn't teach the material well at all
  • lectures are very short and she only shows you basic problems
  • treats college students like children
  • gets lost halfway through her lecture

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • publicly humiliates anyone a minute late
  • very rude and overly punitive
  • passive aggressive and will make you feel stupid
  • unprofessional, condescending, and ineffective

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

41 reviews with , and teaching quality across many years and formats.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 527

Course coverage

MATH40010 reviews
MATH3734 reviews
STAT3004 reviews
STATS3004 reviews
Math3003 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH3353 reviews
MATH4013 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH342 reviews
MATH3722 reviews
MATH1001 review
MATH1031 review
MATH3701 review
MATH4201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 5 · A- 4

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

8

C+ 3 · C 3 · C- 2

D range

3

D 3

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1